City's New Kits - 2019/20

mikemcfc said:
Nope, the thread is "City's New Kits 2019/20"
We were talking about the new kits when I said i thought they were shitty, you said "sales figures suggest otherwise"

Click to expand...

If you read my original post slowly, you may glean that I was clearly referring to sales season upon season. I also pointed out that I was playing devil's advocate and was simply putting forward the view probably held by City and Puma.
 
manimanc said:
Ha ha me too. I drank that by the gallon when I was a kid and in the summer my mum used to make vimto ice lollies by putting it in a plastic cup with a lollie stick.
Great shout about the vimto :)
Click to expand...

I still do, on occasion ;)

Put a touch more Vimto in. Makes the ice lollies tastier lol...my nieces LOVE it
 
DTeacher said:
If you read my original post slowly, you may glean that I was clearly referring to sales season upon season. I also pointed out that I was playing devil's advocate and was simply putting forward the view probably held by City and Puma.
Click to expand...
all i said was that the new ones are shitty, all the rest is your issue, which i don't buy, i'm ok with that.
 
Vimto originated in Manchester in 1908, as healthy herbal drink and had first premises in Granby Row. Maybe the purple is a nod this after all!!
 
mikemcfc said:
all i said was that the new ones are shitty, all the rest is your issue, which i don't buy, i'm ok with that.
Click to expand...

Not what you said. You slagged me off for no reason, due to a lack of basic comprehension imo.

I have no horse in this race. All I did was put an alternative view and made it CLEAR that I was looking at the issue as City and/or Puma might.

I haven't deleted any posts, so feel free to get someone literate to explain them to you.

Better still, please put me on IGNORE. I have neither the time nor the inclination to fall out with any Blues, simply because he/she misinterprets something and then feebly backtracks and is disingenuous to say the least.

P.S. They are only kits. Not worth all the angst ;)
 
DTeacher said:
Suffice to say, CITY have sold MORE kits YEAR UPON YEAR, since the takeover.

I understand and empathise with people who do not like the constant changes. I am merely playing 'devil's advocate' by illustrating the Club's probable strategies- along with the overwhelming majority of other Clubs.

:)
Click to expand...
Not doubting you but how do you know this? Is there somewhere that shows the figures year on year?
 
DTeacher said:
Not what you said. You slagged me off for no reason, due to a lack of basic comprehension imo.

I have no horse in this race. All I did was put an alternative view and made it CLEAR that I was looking at the issue as City and/or Puma might.

I haven't deleted any posts, so feel free to get someone literate to explain them to you.

Better still, please put me on IGNORE. I have neither the time nor the inclination to fall out with any Blues, simply because he/she misinterprets something and then feebly backtracks and is disingenuous to say the least.

P.S. They are only kits. Not worth all the angst ;)
Click to expand...
Yes in your opinion, not mine, no backtracking here, i agreed to disagree. cheers
 
DTeacher said:
Thought you preferred Cherie Blair to be fair...;)
Click to expand...
image.png
 
citykev28 said:
Not doubting you but how do you know this? Is there somewhere that shows the figures year on year?
Click to expand...

Yes, mate. Can't really say much more. The club naturally have the figures.

Not sure if it is a matter of public record though. I would assume that PUMA would have had access to them during negotiations with us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top