City's New Kits - 2019/20

F7-CA6-FC1-12-DD-4-D1-E-B1-C2-1-E524-C97-A376.jpg
This has the opposite issue to the home shirt.

This one is awful with the shorts but good with a pair of jeans. So good for fans, bad for players.

The home one looks too washed out with jeans because of the absence of white. But it’d fine with the shorts. So bad for fans and good for player.

Puma need a 60 minute make over.
 
This has the opposite issue to the home shirt.

This one is awful with the shorts but good with a pair of jeans. So good for fans, bad for players.

The home one looks too washed out with jeans because of the absence of white. But it’d fine with the shorts. So bad for fans and good for player.

Puma need a 60 minute make over.

This one is awful no matter what you wear it with
 
This has the opposite issue to the home shirt.

This one is awful with the shorts but good with a pair of jeans. So good for fans, bad for players.

The home one looks too washed out with jeans because of the absence of white. But it’d fine with the shorts. So bad for fans and good for player.

Puma need a 60 minute make over.

Who's going out in a City top and jeans anyway if they're over the age of 14?
 
So, my girlfriend bought me and my son the away kit, she bought me the authentic player kit and my problem is that it turned up without the 125 years under the badge. It was from the official shop online.

My lads kit has it but mine doesnt even though its advertised on the kit on the official website.

Has anyone else had this? Is it not on the authentic kits? Or do I have a miss print?
 
Got the away shirt today from shop There were 2 numpys in rag shirts in the store I thought wtf is going on but when I was leaving they were in new city shirts .
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.