Doubt anyone will feel to gullible falling for that- extremely well doctored and hardly out the ordinary for them 3 to be buddies
Okay, they should stop working and use their millions for security, decades ahead.
Let's stop them them earning any money, the fuckers, security doesn't cost millions. It'll last forever!
Why should they be scared for the young family they have?
They're all tw@s...
No idea why you’re being arsey with me or even what point you’re trying to make.
Not being arsey with you. I hold no grudge on you.
I find your post bizarre and so posted a response within context.
Perhaps you may look at it again?
My “bizarre” post was saying that people slagging off Meghan Markle for being an attention seeker / doing media for the money etc are fucking idiots. She doesn’t need the money nor the attention.
Just wriggled out of bed, 6:53am here.. who has he apologised too, have I missed summat overnight ?Clarkson has made an apology so let's take that at face value and move on.
I can remember the good old days when an apology was enough.Clarkson has made an apology so let's take that at face value and move on.
Back into the army. Full on protection there. She can go back to being a shite actress.To one of THEIR choice.
Harry, finally, got a say of who is in his life for the benefit of HIS family.
Some sad tw@s criticising the, very likely, hard decision to even do it, knowing his history.
What else is his skill set that you could recommend for him to do, being ostracised from earning within the RF, and being famous enough he needs security for his young family??
I'd like to hear it from anyone.
I'd agree with that on the whole.I have mixed feelings about Jeremy Clarkson.
I believe him to be honest, hard working, intelligent, romantic, juvenile and foolish.
I have enjoyed watching many of his programmes and was sad when the Too Gear programme was dropped by the BBC.
Unfortunately he had overstepped the mark once too often and that was that.
Some of Clarksons' commentaries over the years have really moved me, however there have been other times when he has been un-pc to say the least (truckers - murder a prostitute, a slope etc) which I didn't like.
So to his latest comments re Megan Markle.
I have never heard anyone talk about hating someone on a 'cellular level' before and don't quite understand what he meant by it.
If his comment was deemed to be so outrageously bad, why was it ever allowed to be published? The newspaper must bear some responsibility there.
I don't hold with the view that he is a misogynist and I don't know quite why he singled out Harrys' wife to insult. (Perhaps publicity for a failing publication?)
Clarkson has made an apology so let's take that at face value and move on.
What are these numbers you quote? 191? 196?The colour, contrast and lighting angles of Murdoch's face just isn't right for the pic. There is another tell, all of those blokes are above average height, with Morgan being the shortest (185), Becker (191), Clarkson (196), Murdoch is (178).
There's also a very easy way to check that takes no skill, right click on image and search with google lens.
centimetersWhat are these numbers you quote? 191? 196?
The colour, contrast and lighting angles of Murdoch's face just isn't right for the pic. There is another tell, all of those blokes are above average height, with Morgan being the shortest (185), Becker (191), Clarkson (196), Murdoch is (178).
There's also a very easy way to check that takes no skill, right click on image and search with google lens.
I have mixed feelings about Jeremy Clarkson.
I believe him to be honest, hard working, intelligent, romantic, juvenile and foolish.
I have enjoyed watching many of his programmes and was sad when the Too Gear programme was dropped by the BBC.
Unfortunately he had overstepped the mark once too often and that was that.
Some of Clarksons' commentaries over the years have really moved me, however there have been other times when he has been un-pc to say the least (truckers - murder a prostitute, a slope etc) which I didn't like.
So to his latest comments re Megan Markle.
I have never heard anyone talk about hating someone on a 'cellular level' before and don't quite understand what he meant by it.
If his comment was deemed to be so outrageously bad, why was it ever allowed to be published? The newspaper must bear some responsibility there.
I don't hold with the view that he is a misogynist and I don't know quite why he singled out Harrys' wife to insult. (Perhaps publicity for a failing publication?)
Clarkson has made an apology so let's take that at face value and move on.
So nothing new then ? He actually hasn't apologised to anyone.Good post
Only note I’d add is that he hasn’t issued a apology, it was a shrug of the shoulders ‘oh well’ apology and he hasn’t apologised to whom the article was aimed at
I have mixed feelings about Jeremy Clarkson.
I believe him to be honest, hard working, intelligent, romantic, juvenile and foolish.
I have enjoyed watching many of his programmes and was sad when the Too Gear programme was dropped by the BBC.
Unfortunately he had overstepped the mark once too often and that was that.
Some of Clarksons' commentaries over the years have really moved me, however there have been other times when he has been un-pc to say the least (truckers - murder a prostitute, a slope etc) which I didn't like.
So to his latest comments re Megan Markle.
I have never heard anyone talk about hating someone on a 'cellular level' before and don't quite understand what he meant by it.
If his comment was deemed to be so outrageously bad, why was it ever allowed to be published? The newspaper must bear some responsibility there.
I don't hold with the view that he is a misogynist and I don't know quite why he singled out Harrys' wife to insult. (Perhaps publicity for a failing publication?)
Clarkson has made an apology so let's take that at face value and move on.
Not all of us sit on the computer and scan every image to see if it’s genuine
Back into the army. Full on protection there. She can go back to being a shite actress.
centimetres.
Yes you are correct. I thought that Clarkson had apologised. Obvs not, as yet.Don't recall recanting his words, rather step around the subject.
Unless you can find an actual apology for the publication or to H&M??