Club Badge (merged)

I'm sorry but I've been seeing your posts on a regular basis and personally I don't think you're a City fan..nothing but cuntish comments..not just the badge either..what a twat

whatever, just becuase i cant stand the badge, ive been a season t holder since aged 11 and went to first match aged 5 brum at maine rd i think we won 2-1 1980, does that convince you?

probably not...
 
I'm sorry but I've been seeing your posts on a regular basis and personally I don't think you're a City fan..nothing but cuntish comments..not just the badge either..what a twat
May or may not be the case but we can't all be rags in disguise mate.
 
Looks sound, everyone knows we're a football club why on earth does it need to be on the badge, a massive improvement for me and a well done.
 
not really.... was just asking why you thought that. other posters have answered mate. lots of different opinions, everyone won't always be happy no matter what it looked like

I've seen your designs where you say c is the best and its pretty much the exact same, you've just moved the inner shield a bit and got rid of the rivers. this badge just needs reworking a bit

Honestly mate, I wasn't being a dick so apologies if that's how it came across.

I've tried to explain to another poster earlier in the thread why it looks cartoonish and it's not easy to explain. I just look at it straight away and think cartoon, a few people I showed it to said exactly the same thing. You and others can't see it.

I think the shield popping out of the circle looks like something on a Warner Bros cartoon. I guess the huge text and loads of white space makes it look like it was made for toddlers as well. Also the shield being bevelled at the top, the top half of the shield with the boat being bigger than the bottom half with the rose makes it look like it's popping out of the shield, the designer would probably call it "dynamic". These things aren't standard in traditional badge design, they are features you would usually see in a cartoon drawing.

The colours used almost look a bit primary coloured which also makes it look like it is for toddlers.

All of these things might not mean anything to you, it's in the eye of the beholder. I don't know anything about fine art, someone could explain to me why the mona lisa is a masterpiece, but I don't see what they see, and no amount of explanation will make me see it through their eyes.

If you don't see it as cartoonish, no amount of explaining will make you see it through other people's eyes. But some people do see it as cartoonish, not saying their opinions are any better or worse than yours, people just interpret things differently.
 
For all on here saying don't like it, crap, rubbish, cartoony, embarrassing & stronger versions of disagreement; i would like to see an alternative with the elements being used. Or its a mute argument is it not?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.