chazmcfc said:IS IT FUCK. DID YOU NOT WATCH THE SUNDERLAND GAME. THEY ARE SHIT AWAY FROM HOME AND ARSENAL ARE FUCKING TOOTHLESS.Tricky_Trev said:Spurs' defence is quality.
They didn't have Dawson and King in that game.
chazmcfc said:IS IT FUCK. DID YOU NOT WATCH THE SUNDERLAND GAME. THEY ARE SHIT AWAY FROM HOME AND ARSENAL ARE FUCKING TOOTHLESS.Tricky_Trev said:Spurs' defence is quality.
jimharri said:Er, because this is City forum? You could also say that because we beat Chelsea twice, that we must be a better team than them. As I've already said, we're not going to agree so there's no point continuing going around in circles with this argument.dw7 said:why just compare them to city 9 poits clear
we were shit agains everton hull spurs so
nah . ade part 2:)Tricky_Trev said:Van Pussy's revenge.lee-mcfc said:& how you know?
Why? We've played the same games and we have 1 more point and a better goal difference. They also have a harder run-in than us.bookiesgirl said:i think spurs are fav for 4th now, we need to be above them when we play them
bookiesgirl said:i think spurs are fav for 4th now, we need to be above them when we play them
If King Crock gets fooked again (very likely) and momgy Dawson gets injured they wil struggle at the backTricky_Trev said:Spurs have the 3rd best defence in the league. Look at the league table.chazmcfc said:IS IT FUCK. DID YOU NOT WATCH THE SUNDERLAND GAME. THEY ARE SHIT AWAY FROM HOME AND ARSENAL ARE FUCKING TOOTHLESS.
MCfcBOB said:Why? We've played the same games and we have 1 more point and a better goal difference. They also have a harder run-in than us.bookiesgirl said:i think spurs are fav for 4th now, we need to be above them when we play them
bookiesgirl said:i think spurs are fav for 4th now, we need to be above them when we play them