Lucky Toma said:The Colonel said:blueincy said:Very good read...
He read it and replied on Twitter mate.
Are you sworn to secrecy LT? If not what was his response.
Lucky Toma said:The Colonel said:blueincy said:Very good read...
He read it and replied on Twitter mate.
MCFCinUSA said:sir baconface said:Not saying I necessarily agree with everything said here about Conn. The gist is clear enough though.
As a journalist and a (former?) Blue he must be aware of the Bluemoon forum. Why doesn't he have the bottle to come on here and reply?
my friend, haven't you heard the old and well-worn cliché?
- 'you cannot win an argument with a moron; they only drag the conversation down to their level and beat you with experience'
(and if I were Conn looking at this thread I'd not be wasting my time with at least half the posters on here, and I wouldn't give the proverbial shit)
MCFCinUSA said:sir baconface said:Not saying I necessarily agree with everything said here about Conn. The gist is clear enough though.
As a journalist and a (former?) Blue he must be aware of the Bluemoon forum. Why doesn't he have the bottle to come on here and reply?
my friend, haven't you heard the old and well-worn cliché?
- 'you cannot win an argument with a moron; they only drag the conversation down to their level and beat you with experience'
(and if I were Conn looking at this thread I'd not be wasting my time with at least half the posters on here, and I wouldn't give the proverbial shit)
Balti said:MCFCinUSA said:sir baconface said:Not saying I necessarily agree with everything said here about Conn. The gist is clear enough though.
As a journalist and a (former?) Blue he must be aware of the Bluemoon forum. Why doesn't he have the bottle to come on here and reply?
my friend, haven't you heard the old and well-worn cliché?
- 'you cannot win an argument with a moron; they only drag the conversation down to their level and beat you with experience'
(and if I were Conn looking at this thread I'd not be wasting my time with at least half the posters on here, and I wouldn't give the proverbial shit)
likewise at least half the posters wouldn't give you or Conn the time of day and we don't give a shit either pal
MCFCinUSA said:Balti said:MCFCinUSA said:my friend, haven't you heard the old and well-worn cliché?
- 'you cannot win an argument with a moron; they only drag the conversation down to their level and beat you with experience'
(and if I were Conn looking at this thread I'd not be wasting my time with at least half the posters on here, and I wouldn't give the proverbial shit)
likewise at least half the posters wouldn't give you or Conn the time of day and we don't give a shit either pal
I'm not suggesting or asking if they would my right honourable friend, I'm merely answering the learned gentleman's question; it's nothing personal.
Football supporters.. says enough.
;oD
nijinsky's fetlocks said:Personally I couldn't care less what Conn has to say - he is a parasite who has made money out of faux nostalgic, inaccurate drivel about our club.
Let him yearn for the halcyon days of Swales when we were fucking dire, and let him shed tears at how the nasty Arabs came and restored our pride and standing.
He's an irrelevant dinosaur from a bygone era.
Both the club and the fans have moved on and left him behind.
Leave him and Shindler to compare notes over a half of very bitter.