MANCIO4EVER
Well-Known Member
I think I made up clear I do consider moaning simply no worth.
Nevertheless, on other hand, fact is that FANS are overall Customers who pay the fee twice, with money and passion and They deserve better, otherwise conplaints are entitled.
Now what I d like to debate - out of unusefull bull - is:
We can argue about tactics and displays: thus preferer different managerial philosophies and consequent signings;
We can argue about fitness, form and correct use of players.
As per Einstein, everything is relatively ongoing on the universe becoming: nonetheless there is a crossover point in every human performance.
My modest opinion is that as far as now, City crossover should be fairly put not lower that Birmingham/Everton, and should be a simple matter of fact that something extraordinarly negative must happen to justify City not to win over any side which is lower than that stake. This kind of "extraordinary events" (loads of enjuries, worse refereeing, impractical pitch that equalize skills) may fairly assumed to happen twice a season, no further.
I myself have my personal assessment/preferences about the quality of each of our players - like all of You - but what imho should be a simple matter of fact is that - whichever be the picked line-up, whatsoever any manager may display them - the City side of professional players must prevail clearly over respectull but widely inferior side like Portsmouth, Hull, Bolton ant Stoke - as simple as any employee worldwide use to gain his/hers wages any day of working life.
To made it more clear I wanna use a rhetoric metaphor: it is my firm opinion that, if when 1-0 in front, the whole team would have been substitute with the Accademy team, we now shall be already in the FA last 8.
Again I would stress the point that, whether everyone may argue if the first 15 minutes our side was quite brillant, just effective (like I do) or only decent, it is not arguable that in spite of an overall pathetic display, the only threat Stoke effected to our goal had been a lineout where all the players stayed firm watching the striker headballing free in the center of the box.
Now, If I did not watched and frequented English sport for the last 25 years, and if City was an Italian or Spanish side, I may start wondering if the players are "working against the manager". But because I am totally aware that such things are impossible in the culture of british sport.... I am puzzled and frankly don't undestand!
What are You on about?
Nevertheless, on other hand, fact is that FANS are overall Customers who pay the fee twice, with money and passion and They deserve better, otherwise conplaints are entitled.
Now what I d like to debate - out of unusefull bull - is:
We can argue about tactics and displays: thus preferer different managerial philosophies and consequent signings;
We can argue about fitness, form and correct use of players.
As per Einstein, everything is relatively ongoing on the universe becoming: nonetheless there is a crossover point in every human performance.
My modest opinion is that as far as now, City crossover should be fairly put not lower that Birmingham/Everton, and should be a simple matter of fact that something extraordinarly negative must happen to justify City not to win over any side which is lower than that stake. This kind of "extraordinary events" (loads of enjuries, worse refereeing, impractical pitch that equalize skills) may fairly assumed to happen twice a season, no further.
I myself have my personal assessment/preferences about the quality of each of our players - like all of You - but what imho should be a simple matter of fact is that - whichever be the picked line-up, whatsoever any manager may display them - the City side of professional players must prevail clearly over respectull but widely inferior side like Portsmouth, Hull, Bolton ant Stoke - as simple as any employee worldwide use to gain his/hers wages any day of working life.
To made it more clear I wanna use a rhetoric metaphor: it is my firm opinion that, if when 1-0 in front, the whole team would have been substitute with the Accademy team, we now shall be already in the FA last 8.
Again I would stress the point that, whether everyone may argue if the first 15 minutes our side was quite brillant, just effective (like I do) or only decent, it is not arguable that in spite of an overall pathetic display, the only threat Stoke effected to our goal had been a lineout where all the players stayed firm watching the striker headballing free in the center of the box.
Now, If I did not watched and frequented English sport for the last 25 years, and if City was an Italian or Spanish side, I may start wondering if the players are "working against the manager". But because I am totally aware that such things are impossible in the culture of british sport.... I am puzzled and frankly don't undestand!
What are You on about?