B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
I take your points. I will be having mine for sure but my point is say someone hates needless or has a phobia of needles?Unfortunately it is going to be a choice. And choices often have consequences without them being discriminatory.
Have the vaccine or accept that your choice to not do may limit what you can do if others decide that it puts them at risk.
I agree we should not impose this onto those who prefer not to have it but that choice has to have ramifications otherwise why would lots of people who do not think they are at risk bother to get vaccinated because others who are at risk need them to stay healthy too?
And we only come out of this by protecting the vulnerable as best we can if the vast majority of people will do the right thing here.
I doubt it will be a universal policy but some places will likely decide that to bring back the people they need to rebuild their business they have to go with the majority. And the overwhelming majority will have the vaccine - that is obvious already - and those who cannot for medical reasons should be exempted. But if you opt out by free choice then I do not see it unfair to expect consequences as your choice to opt out has to be matched alongside the choice of the business involved to do what it thinks most of its clientele will prefer.
After all you have a choice to pass a test and drive a car because a car can hurt people if not used correctly. Or to choose not to do this and get the bus. But not to opt out AND still drive a car and hope you do not hurt anyone a a consequence.
Choices work both ways and inevitably have consequences whichever choice is taken.
Are you saying to them people sorry you can't watch your sports team, you can't go to a nightclub and you can't go on holiday?
I'm not sure that's legal or more to the point do we want society going this way?