Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Damocles said:
This is the report that Feigl-Ding and the FT were talking about btw because none of the media think linking to primary sources is important any more.


Here it what is actually says.



Let's just say that I do not believe he has really put the data into its proper context and certainty there by saying "could". And again, I must stress this, these reports are not peer reviewed.
Click to expand...
So not enough UK data so let's go overboard and just ignore all the evidence coming out of SA.
Imperial modus operandi.
Take with a pinch of salt.
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
Great find. Exactly why every time an article is not peer reviewed it should be considered "not yet scientific" for lack of a better term. Of course this guy could be wrong too and the original idea may be correct. We don't know because it's not peer reviewed.
Click to expand...
Proof positive of Imperial crying wolf (again).
Four time less severe will still trigger more hospitalisaions though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.