asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 8,833
I presume the meaning of "the public" was the non-football following public; both those that have no interest and those that actively dislike the game and the pantomime that they see it all as; and to be honest she's probably got a bit of a point, hasn't she?
Can you imagine when some "mums' net militant Millie" gets her teeth into the whole shambles of "project-big-shiny-cup-must-end-up-in-liVARpool*-before-2021-no-matter-the-cost-(both-in-a-financial-sense-or-otherwise)" (or whatever they're calling it now) and all the stuff that WE (the football supporting public) know becomes common knowledge to the general public who haven't been following all the latest "news" relating to this subject matter? They'll have a fcuking field day, and any sane minded person can obviously see that. In THEIR eyes, who are the greedy ones? Who do THEY think ALL the money in football goes to? The answer is the curfew breaking, drunk-driving, morally bankrupt, millionaire -(opinions fed to them by papers like the sun)- players who THEY will probably assume just need to keep their 7 figure incomes flowing in whilst the rest of us suffer financial hardship.... and when they do jump to this conclusion, and "the public" do all start venting their spleen towards the players; do you think the media in this country will jump in on behalf of the players to put the record straight, or do you think they'll just fan the flames of hatred?
Looked like you were just trying to pick an argument to me Asa.
Kinda amusing that your little straw poll of who was going to be offended was a blatantly skewed sample of "people on a football forum" as representative of "the public"s opinion, hilarious actually mate :)
You make a compelling case. Especially the bit about the "Sun". The "Sun" making the case for the public, speaking on behalf of them,that is what they do.. A big football element in the Sun though isn't there? . Perhaps they will decide that the public will need football, will improve sales, no football, does nothing for the "Sun".
It was not a straw poll I conducted. I asked karen if she was part of the public that she was speaking on behalf of. Her answer was that she wouldn't hate the players , that would was not part of that "public".
It may we'll be that the "mums" decide that football players are the devils, endangering their children. I wouldnt see why though as in two months time, many sports, hobbies, employment, may be up and running , why will "joe public" and "mums brigade" choose the footballer to wave their brollies at.
I like Karens contrubutions as a rule. I certainly was not condemning her but felt her reasoning needed to be questioned. You have defended her stoically and clarified her definition of "public" We will see in the coming month or two if the "public",
"mums, "or whoever begin to hate footballers any more than they would have a couple of months ago.
I am however chuffed that you found my post either amusing or hilarious.