COVID-19 — Coronavirus

[Academica]

Glad you are better lovely,it can have a second go so just rest up

Karen did you find it came in waves and returned when you were starting to feel better?

 

[kaz7]

Yeah that's the worry, got a text from the nhs this morning saying I can come out of lockdown in 2 days but at the back of my mind I am thinking the bastard has not finished with me yet.

it is a crafty fucker ,you can feel much better for a day or two then it has another go, give it a few days,hopefully you are over it,stay well x

 

[Rammy Blue]

Don't know happened with quoting this

Naga is the host of BBC Breakfast and she was interviewing the head professor in charge of testing.

Point being if you don’t want to count the 40k sent out then you have to be able to count the ones received back from kits sent out previously, and either way it was over 100k.

It just can’t be any clearer than that, in which case the easiest thing would be to accept it and stop peddling mistruths about the target being missed.

 

[richardtheref]

Sounds scientific compared to the ONS must be right.

I am up there with Trump when it comes to science

 

[kaz7]

Karen did you find it came in waves and returned when you were starting to feel better?

See above,don't worry about it though just don't over stretch yourself

 

[kaz7]

Naga is the host of BBC Breakfast and she was interviewing the head professor in charge of testing.

Point being if you don’t want to count the 40k sent out then you have to be able to count the ones received back from kits sent out previously, and either way it was over 100k.

It just can’t be any clearer than that, in which case the easiest thing would be to accept it and stop peddling mistruths about the target being missed.[

I am not peddling anything ,if you want to trust an age old politician trick that is your perogative,i keep trying to shut it down in this thread as it is not the right thread to debate politics in

 

[SWP's back]

Don't know happened with quoting this

We can leave it at that, you’re wrong and it was you that quoted me in the first place to erroneously correct me.

 

[Blue Potato]

106k tests carried out on 64k people yesterday.

Assume the majority of people are being tested twice to provide increased certainty over the result - is there a rough % figure on how accurate the tests are?

 

[Bazzmand Show]

and?
I think it's made abundantly clear he's not an epidemiologist.

And nothing, he's just not an expert on how to control a virus and shouldn't be treated as such.

 

[SWP's back]

Naga is the host of BBC Breakfast and she was interviewing the head professor in charge of testing.

Point being if you don’t want to count the 40k sent out then you have to be able to count the ones received back from kits sent out previously, and either way it was over 100k.

It just can’t be any clearer than that, in which case the easiest thing would be to accept it and stop peddling mistruths about the target being missed.

Exactly. And we can’t have opinions about facts and figures. They’re either right or wrong. If you tell me 120-10=110, I can’t have an opinion that the answer is 80.