roubaixtuesday
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 4,472
- Team supported
- City
He has clearly chosen to present the numbers to strengthen his argument but the numbers he has used are correct and from a reputable source I do not agree with his stance but to say that is dishonest
View attachment 7235
Yes, the numbers are on the surface accurate.
No, they do not support the headline.
The "analysis" is a deliberate attempt to portray the virus as not harmful to the healthy. That's false, as the debunking shows.
Hence, dishonest.