The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 9,592
Bairstow has had a fuckin stinker of an Ashes, he ain't alone though.
Burns, Broad and Stokes are the only ones whose reputations have been maintained or enhanced.Bairstow has had a fuckin stinker of an Ashes, he ain't alone though.
Batting gone to pot and not the greatest wicketkeeper either.Bairstow has had a fuckin stinker of an Ashes, he ain't alone though.
Are you wearing your blazer and tie before you attempt to enter the hallowed halls that constitute the Lords pavilion, old chap.I wouldn't normally want England to get hammered but a 3-1 defeat at home to a mediocre Aussie team might just give pause to thought to those leading our game.
But then again it probably won't.
We certainly have better wicket keepers than two of those you mention.Surely, we have better batsmen in County Cricket than, Denley, Roy, Bairstow and Butler?
Possibly but County Cricket is increasingly pushed to the margin to cater for 20 - 20 and, next year, The Hundred.Surely, we have better batsmen in County Cricket than, Denley, Roy, Bairstow and Butler?
Was listening to Darren Gough last night and he was saying how much these were earning, just a retainer for the year they are getting £1 million each from the ECB, extra half million for the captain, then £15'000 every test they play, £7'500 one dayers, win bonuses and all sorts of other incentives.Surely, we have better batsmen in County Cricket than, Denley, Roy, Bairstow and Butler?
The Oval has the reputation for producing very high scoring matches. If the wicket has stayed the same as previous years then the Aussies will score heavily.I only managed to watch the first hour.
What’s a par score here?
And how has Mitchell Marsh taken four wickets?!
The Oval has the reputation for producing very high scoring matches. If the wicket has stayed the same as previous years then the Aussies will score heavily.