Thank goodness they did. Imagine what the sport might have been had they been on the decision making committees?!
Well, we can start by making those three sticks a bit bigger and that paddle thing much wider.
That's a long way to hit a six, so the boundary can be closer and if the outfielder can catch the ball anywhere, even in the stands or the car park before it hits the ground, then that's also out.
If the outfielder catches the ball after only one bounce, then that would be extra points for the catching side.
All catchers wear big cupped gloves on both hands.
If the batter hasn't run after three consecutive bowls to him, then he HAS to run regardless.
Underarm or overarm bowling is permitted.
The catching positions need considerably dumbing down. All these names like 'fine leg', 'midwicket', 'square leg' are just too confusing, so change them all to numbers. Position 1, 2, 3 etc and then you could modify them. For example, 3 could also have additional options of Deep 3 or Close 3 for instance, or split the outfield into quadrants with numerical catching points in Quadrant 1, 2, 3 and 4. "
Jones is the catcher at Q1-3" and then it would be possible to spend the next five minutes rattling off all the statistics for catching at that particular position. That would make it so much more interesting.
A 3 minute advertising break every 10 minutes would be a necessity.
The final is always played as a best of seven games.
-------
Just a few simple ideas to improve the game.