Franny's toilet roll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 1,580
Saka did well in a game without any pressure, he's got pace and can run with the ball but he is not as good as Foden .
The team faded badly in the second half, a typical turgid England display was this due to the introduction of Henderson who didn't offer much if anything over Rice, he was on just to give him a run out. In terms of defence, Walker was very good, Stones excellent, Maguire OK but at times he's caught out of position and just stands still. Shaw i felt was poor, negative in build ups, caught for pace, passing was shite , don't know how he gets good reviews. Grealish ok but his schtick seems to be play keep ball and induce a foul, i want him to produce more. Kane did better and needs a goal . On this showing i'm still unsure about Grealish. I think Kane would be ok but not at any price. Haaland is still the man worth chasing. ps Rashford poor, Bellingham good . Would love to have seen Calvert-Lewin start last night instead of Kane . I reckon he would have done well
The team faded badly in the second half, a typical turgid England display was this due to the introduction of Henderson who didn't offer much if anything over Rice, he was on just to give him a run out. In terms of defence, Walker was very good, Stones excellent, Maguire OK but at times he's caught out of position and just stands still. Shaw i felt was poor, negative in build ups, caught for pace, passing was shite , don't know how he gets good reviews. Grealish ok but his schtick seems to be play keep ball and induce a foul, i want him to produce more. Kane did better and needs a goal . On this showing i'm still unsure about Grealish. I think Kane would be ok but not at any price. Haaland is still the man worth chasing. ps Rashford poor, Bellingham good . Would love to have seen Calvert-Lewin start last night instead of Kane . I reckon he would have done well