Daily Mail player ratings vs Chelsea

[Shaelumstash]

I've just read the match report from the Daily Fail, and came across Sam Cunningham's player ratings.

They were so absurd in so many ways I thought they deserved their own thread.

Adarabioyo with the same mark as Caballero! Hahahahahaha!

Manchester City (4-4-2): Caballero 5; Zabaleta 5, Adarabioyo 5, Demichelis 5, Kolarov 5; Celina 5 (Barker 53, 6), Fernando 5.5 (Humphreys 79, 5), A Garcia 5.5, Garcia 6; Iheanacho 6, Faupala 7.5

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ni-s-youngsters-fall-short.html#ixzz40qCHQfn5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[Burtonblue]

He can't have watched any of the game

 

[JustAnotherCityFan]

Yet he's given Barker a 6. Absolutely ridiculous.

 

[Gundogan's Moustache]

How did Humphreys get the same mark as Demichellis who had a mare ?

 

[East Level 2]

So all the defenders and keeper got a 5. Can't fault him for low marks for a defence that conceded five, but they weren't equally responsible.

 

[MadchesterCity]

Havana this highlights how shit the media are, cunts with no intelligence in the most part!

 

[MadchesterCity]

Manchester City (4-4-2): Caballero 5; Zabaleta 5, Adarabioyo 5, Demichelis 5, Kolarov 5; Celina 5 (Barker 53, 6), Fernando 5.5 (Humphreys 79, 5), A Garcia 5.5, Garcia 6; Iheanacho 6, Faupala 7.5

Quoted the ratings as they are that fucking ridiculous

Our best players were Zabaleta 6.5, Adarabioyo 7.5, Garcia 7.5, Iheanacho 7, Faupala 7

 

[lancs blue]

Is there a minus sign missing from Willy's rating?

 

[SamTheGuru]

I've just read the match report from the Daily Fail, and came across Sam Cunningham's player ratings.

They were so absurd in so many ways I thought they deserved their own thread.

Adarabioyo with the same mark as Caballero! Hahahahahaha!

Manchester City (4-4-2): Caballero 5; Zabaleta 5, Adarabioyo 5, Demichelis 5, Kolarov 5; Celina 5 (Barker 53, 6), Fernando 5.5 (Humphreys 79, 5), A Garcia 5.5, Garcia 6; Iheanacho 6, Faupala 7.5

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ni-s-youngsters-fall-short.html#ixzz40qCHQfn5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Haha. This is so obsurd it discredits all papers in their entirety. Seriously. The whole thing is fraud.

 

[Silva Citizen]

Fernando and Willy ??

Most of the kids deserved at least a 7

 

[Ric]

Player ratings are usually done by some bored intern, who has one eye on the game and one eye on Facebook or Pornhub.

City lose 5-1? All the defence must've been shit so I'll give them 5/10.

Anyone hoping for insightful analysis of individual performances in newspaper ratings will be perpetually disappointed.

 

[SamTheGuru]

The disgusting thing is that they will make ridiculous amounts of money off this shit. It is not even close to telling a picture of what happened. Absolutely disgraceful.

 

[lastmanback]

Is the rating any worse than the ranting on this forum from die hard
City fans ?????

 

[SamTheGuru]

Is the rating any worse than the ranting on this forum from die hard
City fans ?????

Yes.

 

[Ric]

Is the rating any worse than the ranting on this forum from die hard
City fans ?????

Probably not, depressingly.

 

[Ric]

The disgusting thing is that they will make ridiculous amounts of money off this shit. It is not even close to telling a picture of what happened. Absolutely disgraceful.

I suspect they'll make to close to fuck all off that shit (on its own).

 

[GeekinGav]

Fernando 5.5???? is that how many steps he took in the whole game when he wasnt standing still?

 

[stony]

Is the rating any worse than the ranting on this forum from die hard
City fans ?????

In every single walk of life it's an unassumable right of anyone to call their own. But when someone else does it!

 

[SamTheGuru]

I suspect they'll make to close to fuck all off that shit (on its own).

Guaranteed I am looking for an outlet but the relativity between the scorings is nigh on insanity. It it proof that the someone who is reporting it did not watch the game.

 

[penguins4kompany]

Yet he's given Barker a 6. Absolutely ridiculous.

Probably cos he sounds English. This is the Mail after all.