Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 37,342
Looks like Adrian Lewis May be joining em after nearly scrapping after his game today!
Can you elaborate more on this? What were the issue's here and in what way did producers buckle to demands?
But why, even if it played a part of the descission, is it a thing to lament? Or even to point so much to femenists and denounce them over this? Theres still a big difference between this "preemtive move" and actually being targetted by a femenist campaign. And besides that, it's not because femenists are at the foundation of certain change that it's bad or that we should lament the femenists, the more so because a lot of social change has happened championed by femenists and accepted by society at large.
It depends on the changes and whether they are best for everyone and for the right reasons..."equality" you know or have you forgotten like most of the 4th wave feminists? If it's just some zealots who want to put the feelings of the few above those of the many then I'm against that line of reasoning. Compliance by force(which was not an argument levelled at this decision that I saw anyone here make) is a side issue more to do when they start passing laws to appease them and when freedom of speech is compromised(it's already starting to happen in some parts of the world ask Jordan Peterson).There seems to be a sort of distinction some people make here by calling it "extreme femenism", the only thing i can understand under extreme femenism is a sort of femenism that is hardly supported by society or rather mocked for being over the top. But that sort of femenism doesn't tend to be so succesfull as "normal" femenists.
The question to ask here, if it really is so that femenists played a part in the motivation of these organisations, is if that is a bad thing?
Ah the good old plea of ignorance, showing your true colours now, you're stumped how you can still hold the moral high ground there aren't you? It's there for all to read anyway. "You seem to posture" it doesn't make sense but I doubt others will have a problem seeing what happened there and how I spelled it out clearly enough. Aliens man they're out there! ;)Rant? It was only a comparison, but i still don't get youre point even as you seem to posture that for some reason you are right...
I'm outraged by that comment Machi!Fuck me some folk have got some severe hang ups. Go out and get laid.
Fuck me some folk have got some severe hang ups. Go out and get laid.
Haha, total nightmare. Drink the wine and pass out, there’s always tomorrow.I had high hopes for getting laid tonight! Romantic meal out with the Mrs and all that!! Kids out supposedly. Nip to the shop for some more wine come back and it’s a bloody houseful with about 15 teenage kids now watching bloody gremlins on Netflix.
Now in the spare room on blue moon on the top level of a pink bunk bed!!
Life.
Why are you so staunchly in defence of the move is a more pertinent question?
simply put this is not a change that was necessary in many peoples eyes(that's a fact take a look a round and that's just the move itself without bringing feminists into it), they are free to point this out just as much as you are to defend it so passionately.
It depends on the changes and whether they are best for everyone and for the right reasons..."equality" you know or have you forgotten like most of the 4th wave feminists? If it's just some zealots who want compliance by force to put the feelings of the few above that of the many then I'm against that line of reasoning.
Ah the good old plea of ignorance, showing your true colours now, you're stumped how you can still hold the moral high ground there aren't you? It's there for all to read anyway. :)
And on a serious note, The line you chose to highlight is the most misleading of the original post.
Who the fuck is saying that a woman worth is predominantly in her looks?
Some of the most competent people I work with are women. I couldn't care less what they look like. Some of the best looking people I know are men, they too are competent. Where aesthetics are part of the brand beautiful people of both sexes are used to promote products. Where technical competence is required those most capable may be male or female and their looks are irrelevant. About 15% of my students are women. 100% of my students are pilots. There are no barriers to women becoming pilots and we spend a great deal of money promoting women in aviation as part of our recruiting policy. But we cannot force more women to chose it as a career despite the advantages we give them in order to bring more women into the field.
Where women have free choice they tend to chose careers which are more people orientated and men tend to chose more "Thing" oriented career. It is not only human nature but nature in general as many studies have shown.
Equal opportunity is a worth while goal. Equal outcome is marxism and responsible for more deaths in the 20th century than anything else.
The people who employ them for their looks, and want them to parade in a sexy provocative manner.... ie the Darts/F1/Boxing/Wrestling fraternity
Im truly amazed that as an intelligent guy you cant see this.