kaz7
Well-Known Member
It is your point so provide it,that is how it worksYes, easily accessible on the web. Feel free
It is your point so provide it,that is how it worksYes, easily accessible on the web. Feel free
Look at the age, expected wages and contract lengths of the players concerned.Disagree. Barry and Kolarov only left because the new manager didn’t fancy them, they hadn’t become bad players overnight and their quality warranted significant transfer fees
Dzeko was always a goal machine and was only 29 and had steered clear of serious injuries throughout his career when we sold him. £14m was derisory.
Fair point. I think that one rankled with me as they’d squeezed every last penny out of us for Lescott (worth it) and Stones (less so) - couldn’t we have asked for 2 or 3 mill ?
You need it explaining again?We’ve been absolutely twatted in the transfer market again then. Have we got a decent market price for anyone we’ve sold since the takeover ?
You are right,add in the middle of a pandemic as well,it is a good dealI might be in a minority but I think €60M is good business for a lad who doesn’t want to play for us, has run down his contract, and who has just returned from a season long injury.
And who was going to give us €40m for Dzeko?Should we start with Dzeko. 40m minimum, proven top class goal scorer with several years left in him.
Barry, anything up to 10m. Proven top class player with an international pedigree who lived the life and had a lot left to offer
Kolarov 10m, international full back, wand of a left foot, still making regular appearances for a CL chasing club now
And there was only one club in for himRegardless of talent. £55mil for someone who has 1 year of their contract left, is on the back of a season long injury and also doesn't want to be here, is a stellar bit of business.