Spelling or right would have help, sausage fingers :-(Succinct andy, well said.
That's a little eyebrow raising for sure. Surely they could've found a picture of him without a Nike logo if that was the issue...Bit odd that the club have done a gallery of the "fab five" returning to training, and excluded Sane from it:
https://www.mancity.com/news/first-...va-de-bruyne-gundogan-stones-zinchenko-return
Bit odd that the club have done a gallery of the "fab five" returning to training, and excluded Sane from it:
https://www.mancity.com/news/first-...va-de-bruyne-gundogan-stones-zinchenko-return
Bit odd that the club have done a gallery of the "fab five" returning to training, and excluded Sane from it:
https://www.mancity.com/news/first-...va-de-bruyne-gundogan-stones-zinchenko-return
They did tweet his return earlier, then removed it to remove his nike logo's, and then tweeted it again, and as many have pointed out, he wasn't part of much of the end of last season, so perhaps isn't considered "fab" at the moment.Bit odd that the club have done a gallery of the "fab five" returning to training, and excluded Sane from it:
https://www.mancity.com/news/first-...va-de-bruyne-gundogan-stones-zinchenko-return
I personally think that is nothing to read into.I personally think there’s a lot to be read into that to be honest:-(