Death penalty for Boston bomber Dzokar Tsarnaev

tiggsywiggsywoo said:
You may not believe in the death penalty, but he did. Live by the sword and die by the sword.

Why not kill him with a bomb, the method he used to kill his victims including an 8 yr old?

It'd be quick, humane and cheap.
 
urmston said:
tiggsywiggsywoo said:
You may not believe in the death penalty, but he did. Live by the sword and die by the sword.

Why not kill him with a bomb, the method he used to kill his victims including an 8 yr old?

It'd be quick, humane and cheap.
You'd describe killing someone by bombing them as 'humane'?
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
urmston said:
tiggsywiggsywoo said:
You may not believe in the death penalty, but he did. Live by the sword and die by the sword.

Why not kill him with a bomb, the method he used to kill his victims including an 8 yr old?

It'd be quick, humane and cheap.
You'd describe killing someone by bombing them as 'humane'?

Yes.

In a suitable enclosed space a bomb would be guaranteed to kill someone instantly and painlessly.
 
urmston said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
urmston said:
Why not kill him with a bomb, the method he used to kill his victims including an 8 yr old?

It'd be quick, humane and cheap.
You'd describe killing someone by bombing them as 'humane'?

Yes.

In a suitable enclosed space a bomb would be guaranteed to kill someone instantly and painlessly.
Would his family be invited along to watch the spectacle?
 
urmston said:
tiggsywiggsywoo said:
You may not believe in the death penalty, but he did. Live by the sword and die by the sword.

Why not kill him with a bomb, the method he used to kill his victims including an 8 yr old?

It'd be quick, humane and cheap.

Like my old man has always said scratch the surface and all extremists are the same brutal monsters, I always thought that the mark of a civilisation was for it to rise above the methods of the barbarians
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
urmston said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
You'd describe killing someone by bombing them as 'humane'?

Yes.

In a suitable enclosed space a bomb would be guaranteed to kill someone instantly and painlessly.
Would his family be invited along to watch the spectacle?

I see no reason why they shouldn't attend if they wanted to.
 
urmston said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
urmston said:
Yes.

In a suitable enclosed space a bomb would be guaranteed to kill someone instantly and painlessly.
Would his family be invited along to watch the spectacle?

I see no reason why they shouldn't attend if they wanted to.

Wouldn't you need bomb proof glass? Or would they watch with binoculars out in a field?
If the later, it could be done in a sports stadium with paying customers to help offset the costs.
 
whats all this shit kill him humanely fuck him ,he wasn't thinking ill bomb these innocent members of the public but try and do it as humanely as possible. feed the fucker to wild dogs fuck him.

these people that say kill humanely or not at all, imagine that bomb going off at the turnstyle whilst your waiting to get into the match ,trying to hold your sons/daughters , family's shattered body together,,this fucker is an evil fucker and deserves to die as painfully as possible
 
Barcon said:
urmston said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Would his family be invited along to watch the spectacle?

I see no reason why they shouldn't attend if they wanted to.

Wouldn't you need bomb proof glass? Or would they watch with binoculars out in a field?
If the later, it could be done in a sports stadium with paying customers to help offset the costs.

I have no desire to see the criminal suffer as he dies, which is why I suggested a bomb as a humane way to kill him. I'm naturally a caring and compassionate person.

The exact arrangements for his execution don't interest me as so long as it is humane.

Why not send your suggestion for a lucrative sports stadium execution to the authorities in Boston? They'd stand to make money from it, not me.
 
urmston said:
Barcon said:
urmston said:
I see no reason why they shouldn't attend if they wanted to.

Wouldn't you need bomb proof glass? Or would they watch with binoculars out in a field?
If the later, it could be done in a sports stadium with paying customers to help offset the costs.

I have no desire to see the criminal suffer as he dies, which is why I suggested a bomb as a humane way to kill him. I'm naturally a caring and compassionate person.

The exact arrangements for his execution don't interest me as so long as it is humane.

Why not send your suggestion for a lucrative sports stadium execution to the authorities in Boston? They'd stand to make money from it, not me.

Just asking mate, you said his family should be allowed to attend if they wanted. Was curious as to how you thought that would be possible.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.