Dribble
Well-Known Member
To be fair, City have been in similar situations several times before.I do think he'd be a good signing but they've been in talks with West Ham since January or February. My guess is Arsenal thought they'd have a free run and could pay less than West Ham want.
They've had no such problem with offering big money for Havertz. To me, that looks like they've fucked up their priorities and they've only got themselves to blame for if they don't get Rice.
I just watched that Talksport video featuring some City fan who sounded like some country yokel chewing on a straw.
It was put to him that City were only showing interest in Rice to drive up the price Arsenal had to pay, & he cited Maguire & several other transfers where we dropped out.
The "City Fan" actually agreed with him! HOWEVER, as City fans, we know City have their valuations & if the selling club try to take the piss, or involve us in an auction, we'll step away. It's git fuck all to do with us trying to up the price our rivals end up paying.
We valued Maguire at £65m plus £7m in achievable add-ons. Leicester wanted £85m, so we left our offer with them. ManUre then stepped in & matched their valuation.
We went on to get Laporté instead & the rest is history...