Dianne Abbott

2sheikhs

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 May 2009
Messages
13,041
One or two people have suggested she gets her own thread.
Maybe she’s a good mp for Hackney. She always gets voted in with a large majority.
Beyond that, I’m struggling to find anything complimentary.
 
In before its locked and disappears lol.

She is a useless fucking politician if anyone wants to hear my opinion.
As long as people don’t cross the line regarding race, gender, appearance etc it should be ok.
 
She had a meal in my local pub on Friday, as she was down for Radio 4's Any Questions.

Didn't leave a tip apparently ;-)
 
In before its locked and disappears lol.

She is a useless fucking politician if anyone wants to hear my opinion.

There's useless and then there's another catergory called the Graylings and nobody reaches the levels of that cluster fuck.
 
There's useless and then there's another catergory called the Graylings and nobody reaches the levels of that cluster fuck.

Start a Grayling thread.

Wait....hang on.....there already is one you say?
 
One or two people have suggested she gets her own thread.
Maybe she’s a good mp for Hackney. She always gets voted in with a large majority.
Beyond that, I’m struggling to find anything complimentary.
To be fair it has to be one of the safest seats around Boris could probably don a red rosette and win.
 
Its a painfully Pavlovian response on here - the minute the Tories look like they are hitting a bad ( or worse ) patch a diversionary attack Labour thread is started or bumped back up list. After Tuesdays vote I suspect threads will be started on every Labour MP by those desperate to cleanse themselves from harbouring thoughts that a Labour govt could be on the horizon.
 
Its a painfully Pavlovian response on here - the minute the Tories look like they are hitting a bad ( or worse ) patch a diversionary attack Labour thread is started or bumped back up list. After Tuesdays vote I suspect threads will be started on every Labour MP by those desperate to cleanse themselves from harbouring thoughts that a Labour govt could be on the horizon.

Threads on Tory politicans = good
Threads on Labour politicians = bad.
 
Its a painfully Pavlovian response on here - the minute the Tories look like they are hitting a bad ( or worse ) patch a diversionary attack Labour thread is started or bumped back up list. After Tuesdays vote I suspect threads will be started on every Labour MP by those desperate to cleanse themselves from harbouring thoughts that a Labour govt could be on the horizon.

He could always start a Dianne Abbot thread? Oh no he can't because he is a new entrant presumably here to stir things up so suggesting to others they do what he wants? Is that the type of Bluemooner we want?

You where saying.......?
 
Don't be ridiculous. You're happy enough to post endlessly slating the Tories, but don't like it when someone puts up a post about a Labour politician and start moaning about being diversionary? Listen to yourself.

you mean like the Boris Johnson thread started by that marxist Hilts? When it comes to Tory posts they tend to be created by all sides on BM and contributed on from all sides too. The likes of the Grayling one gets him rightful kicking because he is fucking useless. ( latest being the make believe ferry company ). However the labour ones about Corbyn, Abbott etc are set up normally by someone from the right - normally at a point when the Tories are about to take a shoeing and are set up with the sole intention to bad mouth and attack the target.
 
you mean like the Boris Johnson thread started by that marxist Hilts? When it comes to Tory posts they tend to be created by all sides on BM and contributed on from all sides too. The likes of the Grayling one gets him rightful kicking because he is fucking useless. ( latest being the make believe ferry company ). However the labour ones about Corbyn, Abbott etc are set up normally by someone from the right - normally at a point when the Tories are about to take a shoeing and are set up with the sole intention to bad mouth and attack the target.

You started the Grayling one, specifically to have a go at him. Fair enough too, but now you're whining that someone starts a thread about a Labour politician. That's beyond pathetic. Defend her if you want, that's what threads or for, not attempts to shut down people talking about someone.
 
You where saying.......?

again contextually meaningless because of how the second quote is used when it doesn't relate to this thread. The point I was making is clear - someone had come on and started posting in a manner that was trying to whip up anti-Abbott vitriol but in such a manner that somebody else would be doing it for him/her.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top