You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
did MH know the Kaka bid WAS going public ?,
- Thread starter LEE BRADBURY
- Start date
Elvis sings theBlues
Well-Known Member
pepsi_dave wrote:
A theory I came up with earlier..... Remember how the transfer often quoted in the press was £200m??
And then all of a sudden it turns into "Hughes has £60m to spend"
Is it not, therefore, fair to suggest that the arabs have said to hughes, here's £60m off you go, buy who you like. We'll take the other £140m and bring you Kaka, Villa, and Abiol.
Happy spending!!!
...or if we want to get really Machiavellian, the £60m is Hughes's budget and the other £140m is for players who are on the Special One's list who we get in now before his arrivial in the summer?
A theory I came up with earlier..... Remember how the transfer often quoted in the press was £200m??
And then all of a sudden it turns into "Hughes has £60m to spend"
Is it not, therefore, fair to suggest that the arabs have said to hughes, here's £60m off you go, buy who you like. We'll take the other £140m and bring you Kaka, Villa, and Abiol.
Happy spending!!!
...or if we want to get really Machiavellian, the £60m is Hughes's budget and the other £140m is for players who are on the Special One's list who we get in now before his arrivial in the summer?
LEE BRADBURY
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,479
That explains everything; totally through me out today because I could not understand the logic behind it, after I heard about the 3rd bid for Bellamy, “twichy†has lots of mates in the press.blue fingers said:LEE BRADBURY said:You know what I find odd about the whole Kaka thing, and it leaves me scratching my head, not that we have gone for Kaka because I am a firm believer in aiming for the top, and I am buzzing we have offered £100 000 000.
What puzzles me though is we bid £100 000 000 whilst allegedly trying to sign bellend and RSC the fee involved for Kaka was obviously going to have fat Sam creaming his undies at the thought of screwing us for another few million and the money grabbing mercenaries at WHU,so in my opinion the delegation in Milan must have known this would happen when the story broke.
Has a spanner been deliberately thrown in to the works of both those deals for bellend and RSC ?,by the leaking of the bidding for Kaka, have both MH deals been deliberately undermined, because now Fat Sam and WHU must be more determined than ever to screw us for what they can.
it must be highly unlikely we will see bellend and RSC now ?
seems really odd that this story broke whilst we were putting in bids for these two player
something does not add up.
Apparently the leak was made by Arry 'Dogface' Redknap who was at Milan trying to negotiate for Adriano while Cooke & Joorgobakian(whatever he's called) were there for Kaka. Furthermore, that leak (which wasn't wanted by city or milan at this point) has temporarilly knocked the talks off the rails.
LEE BRADBURY
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,479
Danamy said:LEE BRADBURY said:You know what I find odd about the whole Kaka thing, and it leaves me scratching my head, not that we have gone for Kaka because I am a firm believer in aiming for the top, and I am buzzing we have offered £100 000 000.
What puzzles me though is we bid £100 000 000 whilst allegedly trying to sign bellend and RSC the fee involved for Kaka was obviously going to have fat Sam creaming his undies at the thought of screwing us for another few million and the money grabbing mercenaries at WHU,so in my opinion the delegation in Milan must have known this would happen when the story broke.
Has a spanner been deliberately thrown in to the works of both those deals for bellend and RSC ?,by the leaking of the bidding for Kaka, have both MH deals been deliberately undermined, because now Fat Sam and WHU must be more determined than ever to screw us for what they can.
it must be highly unlikely we will see bellend and RSC now ? lousy b@stard !!!!!!!!!!,he will have cost us a fortune from here on in.
seems really odd that this story broke whilst we were putting in bids for these two player
something does not add up.
I think City would of preferred to of kept it under wraps a bit longer but for twitchy!! (read link below)
Link: http://www.sport.co.uk/news/Football/12604/Reports_Redknapp_leaked_City-Kaka_talks.aspx
LEE BRADBURY
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,479
you should have said :-)dannybcity said:LEE BRADBURY said:Ffs whats negative about it?, it is a valid point don’t you think ?dannybcity said:Christ, you'd find a negative in winning the bloody lottery. Lighten up LB.
Seriously fat sam must be more resolute than ever, after seeing what we have bid for Kaka, the point I was making is maybe someone does not really want RSC and bellend hardly negative.
It is not even MH “mo†to operate like this putting in bids in dribs and drabs, we usually only here of MH singings when there done.
Lol I was only joking mate.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
LEE BRADBURY said:you should have said :-)dannybcity said:LEE BRADBURY said:Ffs whats negative about it?, it is a valid point don’t you think ?
Seriously fat sam must be more resolute than ever, after seeing what we have bid for Kaka, the point I was making is maybe someone does not really want RSC and bellend hardly negative.
It is not even MH “mo†to operate like this putting in bids in dribs and drabs, we usually only here of MH singings when there done.
Lol I was only joking mate.
It's difficult to show a twinkle in the eye via the internet.