THFC6061 said:
As a lad, I was a huge fan of Rodney Marsh and it almost broke my heart when he signed for Manchester City in March 1972 instead of my beloved Spurs.
At the time, City were leading the First Division by four points but by the end of the 1971-72 season they had slipped to fourth place.
Much of the blame for this has been placed on City being unable to adapt to Marsh but is this really fair criticism?
What are City's fans view of this?
Yes in my opinion he was not a player we really needed.He came in at the expense of Tony Towers,a midfielder,who at that point of his carrer was at the top of his game.
We moved the ball about very quickly,but the format and quickness disappeared and it undoutably had a adverse affect on the team.
I remember Colin Bell would sooner have kicked it into touch than pass it to Marsh.
Don` get me wrong,Marsh was a very gifted player and scored some wonderful goals at City,but when the going got tough,he would hide.
That assessment is based on what I saw,in both home and away games and for what its worth,I firmly believe that City would have won the League,had Marsh not been signed.
No doubt my comments will be like feeding time at the zoo,from the other Blues fans and I expect to get slagged.Good job I`ve got broad shoulders !!<br /><br />-- Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:46 pm --<br /><br />
mancunial said:
No he didn't pick the side, but the biggest cock up was dropping Wynn, he was terrorising defences at that time a really underrated player.
Also Tony Towers was another player who waas dropped to accomodate Marsh and this weakened the midfield area.