Did we land on the moon?

[k-man]

it was real. here's a logical video rebuttal of people saying we didn't <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqlo_spATEM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqlo_spATEM</a>

 

[rickmcfc]

sorry, didnt know there was video lol, check this out and the latest comment, that explains <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1B2UPkelNw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1B2UPkelNw</a>

 

[buzzer1]

Anyone watching it on Virgin?

I've always believed we didn't land on the moon till 1971. This program has consolidated my beliefs especially the thing on shadows. I don't believe in any of the 9/11, 7/7 conspiracy shit but this is well worth a watch.

Nashark, try this documentary and if you can get a copy of Moon Rising then please do. Draw yer' own conclusion

<a class="postlink" href="kiddehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUkr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">kiddehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUkr</a>.

Also youtube buildings on the moon, or moon structures

PS, If anybody wants to shoot down the evidence that has been given to us by credible people, then post a link to Nashark and let him watch it and draw his OWN conclusion, it will save the arguments and name calling yeah.

 

[ElanJo]

Anyone watching it on Virgin?

I've always believed we didn't land on the moon till 1971. This program has consolidated my beliefs especially the thing on shadows. I don't believe in any of the 9/11, 7/7 conspiracy shit but this is well worth a watch.

Nashark, try this documentary and if you can get a copy of Moon Rising then please do. Draw yer' own conclusion

<a class="postlink" href="kiddehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUkr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">kiddehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUkr</a>.

Also youtube buildings on the moon, or moon structures

PS, If anybody wants to shoot down the evidence that has been given to us by credible people, then post a link to Nashark and let him watch it and draw his OWN conclusion, it will save the arguments and name calling yeah.

Please explain something to me about Moon Rising. How can some Photoshop filters tell a you what the "real" colours of the moon are?

 

[buzzer1]

Nashark, try this documentary and if you can get a copy of Moon Rising then please do. Draw yer' own conclusion

<a class="postlink" href="kiddehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUkr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">kiddehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vyVe-6YdUkr</a>.

Also youtube buildings on the moon, or moon structures

PS, If anybody wants to shoot down the evidence that has been given to us by credible people, then post a link to Nashark and let him watch it and draw his OWN conclusion, it will save the arguments and name calling yeah.

Please explain something to me about Moon Rising. How can some Photoshop filters tell a you what the "real" colours of the moon are?

They have equipment that is'nt even on the market yet and is unlikely to be so either, i just listen to what these Experts have to say and evidence given to us and draw my OWN conclusions Elanjo. It seems to me they can enhance something, then enhance the enhancement, they can also uncover hairbrushed stuff as well. Why don't we just let the people like Nashark have a watch of the links and then see what they/he thinks?

Cant remember if you said that you had watched Moon Rising or Disclose Project Elanjo?

 

[ElanJo]

Please explain something to me about Moon Rising. How can some Photoshop filters tell a you what the "real" colours of the moon are?

They have equipment that is'nt even on the market yet and is unlikely to be so either, i just listen to what these Experts have to say and evidence given to us and draw my OWN conclusions Elanjo. It seems to me they can enhance something, then enhance the enhancement, they can also uncover hairbrushed stuff as well. Why don't we just let the people like Nashark have a watch of the links and then see what they/he thinks?

Cant remember if you said that you had watched Moon Rising or Disclose Project Elanjo?

Getting more detail in an image is one thing but adding colour is another. It seems that you're as ignorant as me when it comes to "enhancement techniques". I'd suggest you try finding out whether they are legit or not BEFORE drawing your OWN conclusions.

I'm not stopping Nashark from watching the links.

I watched Moon Rising the other day on youtube. Actually I've only watched half of it so far. Most of what I watched was showing them showing me that the moon is actually rich browns, greens and blues, which, given that I can look up at the sky on most nights and see that that is not the case, has made it difficult for me to watch the rest.

I've seen most documentaries and I actually signed up to the disclosure project to get email alerts a few years ago. I'm interested in the subject tho not so much so that I'm willing to let my guard down and believe everything. Anecdotal evidence on the whole I couldn't give a shit about, as interesting or entertaining as it can be. However, I do think there is such a thing as a good witness and a bad witness, and in this respect I agree with you that pilot sightings are more credible than others IF there is corroborative evidence to support them.

The "Phoenix Lights" case is one of the more interesting ones. I have a mate in the US who saw the "craft" (of which he is adamant - "it blotted out the stars") fly over his head.

 

[buzzer1]

They have equipment that is'nt even on the market yet and is unlikely to be so either, i just listen to what these Experts have to say and evidence given to us and draw my OWN conclusions Elanjo. It seems to me they can enhance something, then enhance the enhancement, they can also uncover hairbrushed stuff as well. Why don't we just let the people like Nashark have a watch of the links and then see what they/he thinks?

Cant remember if you said that you had watched Moon Rising or Disclose Project Elanjo?

Getting more detail in an image is one thing but adding colour is another. It seems that you're as ignorant as me when it comes to "enhancement techniques". I'd suggest you try finding out whether they are legit or not BEFORE drawing your OWN conclusions.

I'm not stopping Nashark from watching the links.

I watched Moon Rising the other day on youtube. Actually I've only watched half of it so far. Most of what I watched was showing them showing me that the moon is actually rich browns, greens and blues.

I've seen most documentaries and I actually signed up to the disclosure project to get email alerts a few years ago. I'm interested in the subject tho not so much so that I'm willing to let my guard down and believe everything. Anecdotal evidence on the whole I couldn't give a shit about, as interesting or entertaining as it can be. However, I do think there is such a thing as a good witness and a bad witness, and in this respect I agree with you that pilot sightings are more credible than others IF there is corroborative evidence to support them.

The "Phoenix Lights" case is one of the more interesting ones. I have a mate in the US who saw the "craft" (of which he is adamant - "it blotted out the stars") fly over his head.

The Pheonix lights one is awesome and has something like 10,000 witnesses or so,if theres one... and all that.

 

[Dubai Blue]

Please explain something to me about Moon Rising. How can some Photoshop filters tell a you what the "real" colours of the moon are?

They have equipment that is'nt even on the market yet and is unlikely to be so either, i just listen to what these Experts have to say and evidence given to us and draw my OWN conclusions Elanjo. It seems to me they can enhance something, then enhance the enhancement, they can also uncover hairbrushed stuff as well. Why don't we just let the people like Nashark have a watch of the links and then see what they/he thinks?

Cant remember if you said that you had watched Moon Rising or Disclose Project Elanjo?

I watched Moon Rising after you recommended it last time and there weren't ANY experts; just some conspiracy theorists with questionable credentials guessing what colour the moon is.

 

[Dubai Blue]

Did anyone ever explain why the flag Armstrong planted on the moon was blowing in the wind when their is no wind on the moon?

Yes. Look up the Mythbusters episode on this very subject. When you move a flagpole in a vacuum (as the astronauts did on the moon), the flag will continue flapping as there is absolutely no resistance to stop it.

Here you go:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBCfuKs9i8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBCfuKs9i8</a>

 

[MCFC BOB]

They put wires in the flag to make it stay upright.
Of course we landed there.