Different reactions to City and Arsenal defeats

[xzbit04]

Spot the difference

[bigimg]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bg572dgIcAA4MLB.jpg:large[/bigimg]

 

[silvasleftleg]

The media is disgusting. It really is.

 

[Pigeonho]

One is a minute out from the other?

 

[aguero93:20]

The Bleacher Report aren't usually as sensationalist as some, but that's still a big difference. And Hamann went down a notch in my book when I read his article.

 

[ell]

Yeah but citys team cost a billion quid and Arsenal produced there own the right way

 

[Citizen of Legoland]

All depends where you look, Ian Cheeseman tweeted a very pro-City article last night.

You need to find opposing views from the same source to prove your point. Sure there'll be one somewhere.

Personally think City have a better chance overturning their game than Arsenal based purely on the teams' recent scoring records, but some will point to Arsenal's CL experience and may see it the other way.

 

[Pigeonho]

All depends where you look, Ian Cheeseman tweeted a very pro-City article last night.

You need to find opposing views from the same source to prove your point. Sure there'll be one somewhere.

Personally think City have a better chance overturning their game than Arsenal based purely on how the team's scoring abilities, but some will point to Arsenal's CL experience and may see it the other way.

Exactly. The Bleacher Reports report on our game was more or less as we all saw it. Said we contained them well and kept them at arms length, and the downfall was the sending off. Nothing bad in that.

 

[aguero93:20]

All depends where you look, Ian Cheeseman tweeted a very pro-City article last night.

You need to find opposing views from the same source to prove your point. Sure there'll be one somewhere.

Personally think City have a better chance overturning their game than Arsenal based purely on how the team's scoring abilities, but some will point to Arsenal's CL experience and may see it the other way.

Exactly. The Bleacher Reports report on our game was more or less as we all saw it. Said we contained them well and kept them at arms length, and the downfall was the sending off. Nothing bad in that.

This is the problem here Pidge, we cant get a fair write up off the English press but we do from the American press, are the English press Shit or Biased? (I already know the sunburn are both)

 

[Skashion]

This doesn't prove anything.

 

[Pigeonho]

All depends where you look, Ian Cheeseman tweeted a very pro-City article last night.

You need to find opposing views from the same source to prove your point. Sure there'll be one somewhere.

Personally think City have a better chance overturning their game than Arsenal based purely on how the team's scoring abilities, but some will point to Arsenal's CL experience and may see it the other way.

Exactly. The Bleacher Reports report on our game was more or less as we all saw it. Said we contained them well and kept them at arms length, and the downfall was the sending off. Nothing bad in that.

This is the problem here Pidge, we cant get a fair write up off the English press but we do from the American press, are the English press Shit or Biased? (I already know the sunburn are both)

The OP brought the Bleacher Report into it. And our friend above has already mentioned Cheeseman's report. At the end of the day though, who cares either way? We know how we played and i'm not sure about you, but I was proud of how we dealt with Barca both before and after the sending off.