Go on, why does it?
Because when things are going wrong it's the managers job to try and do something about it.
Go on, why does it?
Because when things are going wrong it's the managers job to try and do something about it.
I think what was happening on the pitch should have been concerning the manager and yes he should have been doing something about it, because most of it was his fault.Ah, I see. So ranting and raving in the technical area is the only way to do that.
Ah, I see. So ranting and raving in the technical area is the only way to do that.
Ah, I see. So ranting and raving in the technical area is the only way to do that.
Yaya is not perfect, he has his faults and we're all pretty much aware of what they are, but Pellegrini is exposing Yaya and hanging him out to dry.That bit's the clincher as regards his continued credibility as a manager at this exalted level, if only because it's far from the first time it's happened. Pellegrini's big game management has been shocking for some time now, the lone exceptions being Seville away, where just for once we set up to counterattack, with Ya Ya out of the central midfield duo, and Chelsea at home, where Mourinho's instinctive caution and focus on not losing away to his rivals played into our hands.
In virtually every other game of consequence in the last 12 months, he's picked Ya Ya in a central midfield duo and then then stood there looking bemused as we've been overrun in midfield. Arsenal shredded us at the Etihad and could have scored 6 (I think Ya Ya was away for that one though), the dippers outclassed us at Klanfield where we somehow got away with only a 2-1 defeat, Barca made mugs out of us home and away, and only Joe Hart prevented a cricket score, we got gubbed 4-1 against a shit United team where Toure's reward for the most disinterested (verging on the criminally negligent) 45 minute contribution I think I've ever seen from a City player was not the shepherd's crook but the captain's armband, we got picked off 4 times at Spurs, we should have been 3 down at Monchengladbach before Pellers put Ya Ya out of his misery and we rallied, we were comprehensively outplayed at home by Seville only to snatch an ill deserved winner, and yesterday we could have had no complaints if Liverpool had scored 8.
None of the above is particularly aimed at Ya Ya. He is what he is, a fabulous talent, but one who is closer to 33 than 32, weighs 14 stone at a conservative estimate, and is as ill suited to coping with athletic, pressing, counterattacking teams as you could possibly imagine, and yet Pellegrini has deployed him in a role that actively weakens us as a unit again and again and again. In the past we've been able to get away with it, but even against Newcastle recently we could have been 3-0 down before the Sergio show began. Every team in the Premiership has bundles of cash now - Leicester sit top of the table FFS - and there is an increasing trend toward blanket defence coupled with lightning counterattacking. It was reported yesterday that we have seen record levels of victories from teams enjoying less than 50% of the possession. Sending one's team out without paying specific heed to how the opposition plays then looks increasingly foolish, and in doing so Pellegrini appears naive and arrogant in equal measure. Yesterday I think marked a watershed and I don't think anyone in the upper echelons of the club's hierarchy will have been impressed with his post match comments.
I think what was happening on the pitch should have been concerning the manager and yes he should have been doing something about it, because most of it was his fault.
So sitting/standing there not saying anything is the way to go about it. Does he use telepathy? Is he some sort of Jedi?Ah, I see. So ranting and raving in the technical area is the only way to do that.