NQCitizen
Well-Known Member
I think Serie A is a hard thing to judge Ancelotti on as it wasn't exactly a level playing field at the time. Even then he won 2 CL titles in his spell at Milan.city91 said:NQCitizen said:Pretty sure that actually points at Ancelotti being better at managing egos than Pep (4 years management of a player absolute max) and Klopp (always lost his best players).city91 said:I'm struggling to see how Ancelotti has handled big ego's for a sustained period at a club. He has managed 'elite clubs' in Juventus, AC Milan, Chelsea, PSG and Real Madrid and won 3 league titles in over 15 seasons. That is an absolute shocking return for a so called 'elite' manager. I couldn't care less about he CL record because you need a large degree of luck in the competition. There is no hiding place for managers in the league and for me he is worse than Mancini.
Pep and Klopp on the other hand are masters at playing a certain style and they have the results to back their style. With our squad needed a huge rebuild and our academy on the rise, we should be going all out to get either of them two and transforming this team.
To dismiss Ancelotti's Champions League record (incidentally the best ever) is plainly insane.
He didn't struggle too much when he knocked Pep out 5-0 on his way to arguably the most high pressure Champions League win of all time.
Every discussion that discounts Ancelotti is horribly flawed imo.
Firstly, it's impossible to blame a manager for a player leaving if it is to a club where there is more money on the table and/or a better chance of winning things.
Secondly, every discussion that people have about Pep is also flawed. There is the same rhetoric about him walking into the perfect squad and easing to success. The fact is that Pep managed Barca to the highest level any club has got to in this generation. They were a trophy gathering machine who were unplayable.
Thirdly, do you believe that Ancelotti's domestic record is good enough?
Ancelotti would have been the perfect replacement for Mancini as he would have been bringing a squad together, adding a few players and competing for trophies. However, we are not at that stage anymore. We need a rebuild and a style to adapt that rebuild to. When there are managers like Klopp and Pep (maybe next year) on the market you do not risk your chances of getting them by going for Carlo IMO.
Outside of that Carlo has won a double in 2 seasons in England, a ligue 1 in 2 in France and a Champions League in a full season in Spain.
What's more he is proven at coming into the biggest clubs and delivering instant success with not a huge level of change.
I rate Pep, Carlo and Mourinho as possibly the 3 best managers in the world today all things considered. I'm surprised to see so many people putting him below that tier.
It's a personal preference for me on character, adaptability and playing style I prefer Carlo to Pep. But I do like Klopp over Pep too for the potential.