Discussion: Potential Pellegrini Replacements {merged}

  • Thread starter Deleted member 58678
  • Start date
3rdgenerationblue said:
Damocles said:
3rdgenerationblue said:
He is clearly going nowhere.

if the club ever wanted to make a statement then tonight was it.

He was sat between the Spanish boys at the game.

For me, absolutely no more proof required.

This means nothing. We aren't killing the guys dog, we are allowing a man who has won us a title to bow out gracefully to allow a younger man a shot at the role, and he is allowing us the chance to get a highly desired target a year earlier.

If Pellers were to stand aside it would be with smiles and handshakes all around, and an open invitation to pop into the Chairmans Lounge whenever he is in the country.

We dont sack people and have a barny with them in the press any more.

Again I wonder how many people really understand what it is that City are attempting to build here


rude prick.

who the fuck are you to question my understanding of what we are trying to build.

And how on earth can you laterally leap to that conclusion when I stated he won't be leaving?

twat.

A ban hammer could be looming I fear before long.
 
Ray78 said:
I am being honest here Klopp isn't a better manager than either Mancini or Pellegrini.

But let's be honest Ray, you're not being honest at all, what you are doing is expressing your opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

And if I'm being honest I think you're talking shite.
 
oakiecokie said:
3rdgenerationblue said:
Damocles said:
This means nothing. We aren't killing the guys dog, we are allowing a man who has won us a title to bow out gracefully to allow a younger man a shot at the role, and he is allowing us the chance to get a highly desired target a year earlier.

If Pellers were to stand aside it would be with smiles and handshakes all around, and an open invitation to pop into the Chairmans Lounge whenever he is in the country.

We dont sack people and have a barny with them in the press any more.

Again I wonder how many people really understand what it is that City are attempting to build here


rude prick.

who the fuck are you to question my understanding of what we are trying to build.

And how on earth can you laterally leap to that conclusion when I stated he won't be leaving?

twat.

A ban hammer could be looming I fear before long.


nice work pebble thrower.
 
Rammy Blue said:
Ray78 said:
I am being honest here Klopp isn't a better manager than either Mancini or Pellegrini.

But let's be honest Ray, you're not being honest at all, what you are doing is expressing your opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

And if I'm being honest I think you're talking shite.

Likewise.
 
Ducado said:
Ray78 said:
I am being honest here Klopp isn't a better manager than either Mancini or Pellegrini.

I don't know much about him Ray, but I suspect that some people have been caught up in some strange messianic type syndrome when it comes to Klopp, they will be claiming he can do miraculous healing next (which would be good if RSC was still here I guess)

People who dont know a lot about him say things like this. People who do know a lot about him dont.

Klopp is about nine million times the manager of Bobbyor Pellers, with all due respect to both of them. He is one of those people who are seen as great thinkers of the game, and his geigenpressing style was revolutionary for the period. Not only this but he has cultivated some of the major talents in European football both in an attacking and defensive sense, then beat Munich to the league title several years running and put his club in a CL final. Most impressively he managed to do this on a comparative shoestring and selling his best players every year.

He is a bit like Cruyff in that he sees the game in a very specific way but has all of the modern management skill you would expect with a great record to boot.

He would do astonishing things with a squad like ours.
 
3rdgenerationblue said:
Damocles said:
3rdgenerationblue said:
He is clearly going nowhere.

if the club ever wanted to make a statement then tonight was it.

He was sat between the Spanish boys at the game.

For me, absolutely no more proof required.

This means nothing. We aren't killing the guys dog, we are allowing a man who has won us a title to bow out gracefully to allow a younger man a shot at the role, and he is allowing us the chance to get a highly desired target a year earlier.

If Pellers were to stand aside it would be with smiles and handshakes all around, and an open invitation to pop into the Chairmans Lounge whenever he is in the country.

We dont sack people and have a barny with them in the press any more.

Again I wonder how many people really understand what it is that City are attempting to build here


rude prick.

who the fuck are you to question my understanding of what we are trying to build.

And how on earth can you laterally leap to that conclusion when I stated he won't be leaving?

twat.

Ill get a wahbulance
 
thesilvalining said:
goalmole said:
Don't think we will ever see Pep managing City. If he wanted to come to us he could have come in 2013. Txixi and Soriano had nicely got their feet under the table and it would have been a great time for the Barca trio to put their stamp on the Project. The only reason he has been linked with us in the minds of the fans is because he left Barca just as Barca men were coming here. Everything we have heard since then has been tailored and edited to fit that narrative.
The fact that he didn't come then says to me that he doesn't want to come at all.
Ps.The way he visibly took delight in our failure at the Bernabeu in the CL doesn't make me hanker for the day when he pitches up at ours.
He agreed to manage bayern mid way through the season, whilst Mancini still had the job and was fighting for things. He wasn't retiring at the end of the season like heynckes so we couldn't make the appointment then watch him bow out gracefully at the end of the season, and even if we wanted rid of Mancini at that time( which they probably did) we couldn't just hire him to start straight away as he was on a sabbatical.
P.s. Nou camp not bernabeu
You're right of course, but I found it to be out of order if he ever had any intention of managing City in the near future.
 
Damocles said:
Ducado said:
Ray78 said:
I am being honest here Klopp isn't a better manager than either Mancini or Pellegrini.

I don't know much about him Ray, but I suspect that some people have been caught up in some strange messianic type syndrome when it comes to Klopp, they will be claiming he can do miraculous healing next (which would be good if RSC was still here I guess)

People who dont know a lot about him say things like this. People who do know a lot about him dont.

Klopp is about nine million times the manager of Bobbyor Pellers, with all due respect to both of them. He is one of those people who are seen as great thinkers of the game, and his geigenpressing style was revolutionary for the period. Not only this but he has cultivated some of the major talents in European football both in an attacking and defensive sense, then beat Munich to the league title several years running and put his club in a CL final. Most impressively he managed to do this on a comparative shoestring and selling his best players every year.

He is a bit like Cruyff in that he sees the game in a very specific way but has all of the modern management skill you would expect with a great record to boot.

He would do astonishing things with a squad like ours.

There are no real guarantees he can replicate that at City.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.