HelloCity
Well-Known Member
I get what you are saying, but you have to differentiate between on the one hand what we consider might conceivably be possible, albeit we don't have the technology yet. And on the other hand what we cannot conceive of how it could be possible, even if we did have the technology.
The idea in 1920 of us visiting the moon is firmly planted in the former category. We had no idea how to build the rocket, or the many technological challenges to overcome. But we could easily envisage a scenario where one day it might be possible. No laws of physics needed to be re-written, we just needed to invent some stuff.
But travelling thousands, millions, or even billions of light years? I can't imagine of any way it could be conceivable, even with technology infinitely more advanced than our own. We'd need entirely new laws of physics.
All this has always been the way of thinking though. Our understanding of the universe and its laws will change and evolve just like they always have. I think it’s fair to say that 100 years from now that there will be technologies that were impossible and unthinkable today.