You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Does any other blues bet on the rags?
- Thread starter edtheblue
- Start date
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
I hate the rags but always bet on them after they go a goal behind. Try it, you win a fortune more than you lose.olddirty said:Never bet on clubs you love or hate with passion.
It will ALWAYS affect your reasoning.
kinkladz-ade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 1,226
i always put on an accumulater for all the top clubs/favs to win which normally includes City,Utd,Chelsea,arsenal,spurs
B
B
bluemc1
Guest
yeah i will back the twats, am putting £50 on them to win next 4 games norwich, apr, west ham, reading, easy money, if they slip up i dont give a shit, win win
nijinsky's fetlocks said:Of course I bet on the rags - as a gambler,why the fuck wouldn't I?
Here is a simple explanation for the hard-of-thinking.
The basic concept of gambling is to win money.
Now,I don't really care whether that means betting on the rags,the boat race,the X factor,or what colour hat the Queen will wear at Royal Ascot.
Because even money is even money,whatever you bet on.
The rags have a habit of coming from behind to win games.
So,by waiting until they fall behind in a match,you get a far better price on them to win,which they often do.
If this means walking out of the bookies with a wad of notes in my back pocket,then it's all good,because my City seasoncard is in my wallet too.
So I have won money from something I fucking hate.
I can't stop the rags winning,but a nice meal in a decent restaurant that the bastards have paid for makes it easier to live with.
prostitution.
solley attwell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 2,338
If God made an appearance at my front door and wanted a £1000 subscription to his favourite charity and in return City win the league, then betting on the rags is a worthwhile excercise in losing money
nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
spam1967 said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:Of course I bet on the rags - as a gambler,why the fuck wouldn't I?
Here is a simple explanation for the hard-of-thinking.
The basic concept of gambling is to win money.
Now,I don't really care whether that means betting on the rags,the boat race,the X factor,or what colour hat the Queen will wear at Royal Ascot.
Because even money is even money,whatever you bet on.
The rags have a habit of coming from behind to win games.
So,by waiting until they fall behind in a match,you get a far better price on them to win,which they often do.
If this means walking out of the bookies with a wad of notes in my back pocket,then it's all good,because my City seasoncard is in my wallet too.
So I have won money from something I fucking hate.
I can't stop the rags winning,but a nice meal in a decent restaurant that the bastards have paid for makes it easier to live with.
prostitution.
Grow up you fucking imbecile.
nijinsky's fetlocks said:spam1967 said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:Of course I bet on the rags - as a gambler,why the fuck wouldn't I?
Here is a simple explanation for the hard-of-thinking.
The basic concept of gambling is to win money.
Now,I don't really care whether that means betting on the rags,the boat race,the X factor,or what colour hat the Queen will wear at Royal Ascot.
Because even money is even money,whatever you bet on.
The rags have a habit of coming from behind to win games.
So,by waiting until they fall behind in a match,you get a far better price on them to win,which they often do.
If this means walking out of the bookies with a wad of notes in my back pocket,then it's all good,because my City seasoncard is in my wallet too.
So I have won money from something I fucking hate.
I can't stop the rags winning,but a nice meal in a decent restaurant that the bastards have paid for makes it easier to live with.
prostitution.
Grow up you fucking imbecile.
bit heavy that pal.
you must be really short of doe.
So im not the only one who broke the ethical code.
I did back them at 6/1 last week as it softened the blow a little bit, but wish I had lost.
A few weeks back my lad had a treble
Chelsea at Arsenal WON
City at Fulham WON
Spurs v Twats WON
Potential winnings £350.00
However when they got it back to 2 v 2 I told him he must now back them and the draw. He said Dad "I dont back them", I said he must as they always do it.
He conceded and had £50 on each, then gave me a bollocking for tossing off £100.
I said no , you won £250.
I do like the fact that his heart was ruling his head, but sometimes you need to be sensible and win the money.
I did back them at 6/1 last week as it softened the blow a little bit, but wish I had lost.
A few weeks back my lad had a treble
Chelsea at Arsenal WON
City at Fulham WON
Spurs v Twats WON
Potential winnings £350.00
However when they got it back to 2 v 2 I told him he must now back them and the draw. He said Dad "I dont back them", I said he must as they always do it.
He conceded and had £50 on each, then gave me a bollocking for tossing off £100.
I said no , you won £250.
I do like the fact that his heart was ruling his head, but sometimes you need to be sensible and win the money.