Lock them both up I would say.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter RichardDunneOwnGoal
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Lock them both up I would say.
The FBI will confirm that
And you think that this is acceptable what Trump is doing to this poor woman, wow you really are much lower than I thought!!
Still adherence to guilt without trial, then added to a "if you're not with me then you must be my enemy and you're morally corrupt".
Maybe you could demand that I go to jail too? You know, complete the trifecta?
Three words:
"Lock her up".
So your argument is because Trumps supporters are ****s and don't believe in the adherence to the justice system then your "side" should be too?
If you're willing to abandon your convictions then what exactly are they worth to you? What makes you better than those people if you're doing the same thing?
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
No.So your argument is because Trumps supporters are ****s and don't believe in the adherence to the justice system then your "side" should be too?
If you're willing to abandon your convictions then what exactly are they worth to you? What makes you better than those people if you're doing the same thing?
I was just pointing out the hypocrisy in your post.
No.
I was just pointing out the hypocrisy in your post.
What hypocrisy?
To be hypocritical, you'd have to think that I either thought that way about Clinton, which I don't, or supported the people who do, which I don't, or have not argued the same point against that previous, which I have.
This is yet more "you don't exactly agree with everything I say therefore you must support the opposite side to me" bullshit.
Still adherence to guilt without trial, then added to a "if you're not with me then you must be my enemy and you're morally corrupt".
Maybe you could demand that I go to jail too? You know, complete the trifecta?
You appear to be accepting what Trump is doing as okay?
Without a proper trial Trump is trashing this women for being brave enough to testify and for what purpose?
So he can bully any other women who had any thoughts of testifying against his pick or perhaps its the 20 women who have allegations against him?
But hey what do these women's lives matter when its one man's life that they are going to trash?
You appear to be accepting what Trump is doing as okay?
Without a proper trial Trump is trashing this women for being brave enough to testify and for what purpose?
So he can bully any other women who had any thoughts of testifying against his pick or perhaps its the 20 women who have allegations against him?
But hey what do these women's lives matter when its one man's life that they are going to trash?
Because he's entitled to free speech like everybody else is.
And YET AGAIN the underlying logic of your post is that this man is guilty without trial.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
What hypocrisy?
To be hypocritical, you'd have to think that I either thought that way about Clinton, which I don't, or supported the people who do, which I don't, or have not argued the same point against that previous, which I have.
This is yet more "you don't exactly agree with everything I say therefore you must support the opposite side to me" bullshit.
This hypocrisy:
"This man is guilty bevause I said so. Even without a trial. Also we should kill his supporters"
For the record, I don't support either party. This whole shitstorm is so far beyond a political argument. What Trump is doing is dehumanizing the whole political landscape in order to serve his own selfish needs, and he doesn't care who he destroys in the process.
Because he's entitled to free speech like everybody else is.
And YET AGAIN the underlying logic of your post is that this man is guilty without trial.
Free speech on what grounds? He is the president of the United States these are the people that he is supposed to serve. Lets imagine you live in the US and have spoken out about Trump's pick for something against you when you were younger. How would you feel being publically humiliated by your own president who wants to make you public enemy number one. What about the repercussions of all of this do you not think that there are nut jobs from Trump's followers who are going to hurt this women.
Clearly being a right winger you have not thought this through at all? This lady is someone's mother, wife, sister or even daughter who could now be living in fear of some revenge attack what could follow after this thunder**** has just done because he can't get his own way. Cut the smart remarks and tell what part of that do you find acceptable!!!
Free speech on what grounds?
On the grounds that he exists as a citizen of the US so is as entitled to those rights as everybody else.
Unless you're suggesting that US law should only apply to people that you personally agree with, comrade?
Clearly being a right winger you have not thought this through at all?
I'm still not a right winger no matter how hard you bang that drum, and your idea that people should only be subject to the protections of the Western justice system if you like them or they dont hurt your feelings is fascism
- Status
- Not open for further replies.