Donald Trump

[kaz7]

Nah, full speed ahead.

Ha for you maybe ;)

 

[ChicagoBlue]

That tw@ has cancer, hasn't he??

Yep. Maybe there IS a God?

 

[Ancient Citizen]

You don't have to throw your toys out of the pram against cogent reply.

You're pitting against a man that wants to give power back to the people and claiming that's a 'mistake'.

I will never understand this way of thinking.

*SMH*

'Power to the people' has been the rallying call for this kind of politics for years, as is 'For the many not the few.'
It's not worked yet, but it's good to have faith I suppose.

 

[Bigga]

'Power to the people' has been the rallying call for this kind of politics for years, as is 'For the many not the few.'
It's not worked yet, but it's good to have faith I suppose.

It hasn't worked because of the counter argument of powerful corporations.

But it's we the people that put Gov into power to help us navigate the complexities of this capitalistic world.

I mean, here's an example, how the fook are there two basement living standards; one being a 'living wage' and one below that??

It's simply not logical, but we keep shovelling down the shit we're given to swallow and told not to complain!

I think people have had enough of all sorts of disparity.

 

[Mike D]

And the Germans must surely have their own precedent in mind.

They have a lot of time to reflect and are seeing history repeating itself, and they should know more than anyone else.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

It hasn't worked because of the counter argument of powerful corporations.

So the people don't vote for leftist politics because big corporations tell them not to.
Somehow, I doubt that.

But it's we the people that put Gov into power to help us navigate the complexities of this capitalistic world.

It certainly is, and those people know what works for them, which is why I doubt they'll vote for Sanders, but
we'll see, if the Dems had stronger candidates I would agree.

 

[Bigga]

So the people don't vote for leftist politics because big corporations tell them not to.
Somehow, I doubt that.


It certainly is, and those people know what works for them, which is why I doubt they'll vote for Sanders, but
we'll see, if the Dems had stronger candidates I would agree.

You're missing the point on big corp. They lean into the Gov as they run business in the country.

Is that not so??

Also (and I can't believe I'm saying this yet again!) how is it that when Sanders is asking for people to be paid a Human worth, you're basically saying people know what's good for them to be struggling!!

It's stupendous in incredulity!

 

[Ancient Citizen]

You're missing the point on big corp. They lean into the Gov as they run business in the country.

Is that not so??

Also (and I can't believe I'm saying this yet again!) how is it that when Sanders is asking for people to be paid a Human worth, you're basically saying people know what's good for them to be struggling!!

It's stupendous in incredulity!

And I can't believe I have to say this again, it is very easy promising more money for workers, but unless it can
be backed up with credible means to achieve that aim, people won't fall for it. Taxing companies beyond a given median
results in less tax returned, something that you continually fail to grasp, but the general populace does.
It would be marvellous if everyone got £50 an hour, promises are easy, delivering isn't.

 

[Bigga]

And I can't believe I have to say this again, it is very easy promising more money for workers, but unless it can
be backed up with credible means to achieve that aim, people won't fall for it. Taxing companies beyond a given median
results in less tax returned, something that you continually fail to grasp, but the general populace does.
It would be marvellous if everyone got £50 an hour, promises are easy, delivering isn't.

Why are you being extreme?

Are you suggesting people would prefer to live on £9 an hour rather than £12 as they "grasp" that situation?

Your argument continues to fall down when companies post healthy profits into their financial records whilst workers doff their caps and 'understand' they can't be paid more. The world will be doomed if companies make a tiny bit less profit.

Sheer lunacy in argument!

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Why are you being extreme?

Are you suggesting people would prefer to live on £9 an hour rather than £12 as they "grasp" that situation?

Your argument continues to fall down when companies post healthy profits into their financial records whilst workers doff their caps and 'understand' they can't be paid more. The world will be doomed if companies make a tiny bit less profit.

Sheer lunacy in argument!

The lunacy is your view of how economies work mate, do you think that a 33% increase in wages, enforced by the state,
would simply result in companies just receiving a tiny bit less profit? Would they start expanding, and hiring more people?