Donald Trump

[SebastianBlue]

I thought it was obvious that the Democrats need to unite behind their candidate, and have the time to work out how to sort their nominations out after the election.

They have to sort out the nomination before the general election, which is the issue the analyst is speaking to, as there are currently very deep divisions in the party, especially when it comes to Sanders Buttigieg, and Biden (who in some ways is a Clinton surrogate). That’s not even including the Bloomberg factor or Warren or Klobuchar supporter’s possible responses to a Sanders nomination.

It is a real possibility that significant portions of the Democratic Party do not get behind the eventual nominee, but the analyst is trying to make a case for why doing that with conviction will lead to a landslide victory for the democratic nominee based on the political data they are analysing.

And such a landslide, which would be beyond even Trump and co’s ability to tamper with to turn in to a victory for him (without it being very, very obvious), meaning Trump is even more likely to reject the results of the election as fraudulent to avoid leaving office.

 

[MillionMilesAway]

They have to sort out the nomination before the general election, which is the issue the analyst is speaking to, as there are currently very deep divisions in the party, especially when it comes to Sanders Buttigieg, and Biden (who in some ways is a Clinton surrogate). That’s not even including the Bloomberg factor or Warren or Klobuchar supporter’s possible responses to a Sanders nomination.

It is a real possibility that significant portions of the Democratic Party do not get behind the eventual nominee, but the analyst is trying to make a case for why doing that with conviction will lead to a landslide victory for the democratic nominee based on the political data they are analysing.

And such a landslide, which would be beyond even Trump and co’s ability to tamper with to turn in to a victory for him (without it being very, very obvious), meaning Trump is even more likely to reject the results of the election as fraudulent to avoid leaving office.

I meant sorting the nominations for the next time - I'd have thought that was obvious from "need to unite behind their candidate"

 

[mat]

I meant sorting the nominations for the next time - I'd have thought that was obvious from "need to unite behind their candidate"

It's obvious to everybody apart from 90 odd superdelegates who are trying to derail one of the candidates and will continue to do so should he reach the magic numbers before the convention.

 

[bluethrunthru]

Does the Corona virus turn you orange?

You are thinking of the Lucozade Lurgi

 

[SebastianBlue]

I meant sorting the nominations for the next time - I'd have thought that was obvious from "need to unite behind their candidate"

As @mat has said, the analysis is about why they should get behind whichever candidate is nominated, even though right now that looks very unlikely, as it would actually lead to a landslide victory for the Democrats (where as some pundits don’t think that is possible at all, regardless of whether all democrats get behind the candidate).

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

You are thinking of the Lucozade Lurgi

Lucozade?
More likely he’s been Tangoed.

 

[bluethrunthru]

Lucozade?
More likely he’s been Tangoed.

Tango Trauma's then?

 

[super_city_si]

US health officials and scientists (including cdc) have to have any statements vetted by the office of VP Pence before release.

 

[SebastianBlue]

US health officials and scientists (including cdc) have to have any statements vetted by the office of VP Pence before release.

Have to check to see if it sufficiently praises the lord and doesn’t contain any secret Satan worshiping homosexual socialist feminist buzz words like “science”, “evidence”, or “facts”.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

US health officials and scientists (including cdc) have to have any statements vetted by the office of VP Pence before release.

Just seen. Absolute madness.