west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,276
My Lord, that is a tough read.
You’re right in that it might not be true and there’s some dodgy people associated with the accuser, but it fits into Trump’s pattern of behaviour. Doubt it will ever come to court but there’s plenty more that is much more likely to.My Lord, that is a tough read.
Without it going to court and seeing the evidence though, it’s tough to see whether or not it was definitely true, I’ve just done some reading online on it.
Nothing surprises me any more with the elites associated with Epstein, so it wouldn’t make me fall off my chair if it was true, sadly.
I think in these types of cases, there needs to be more done to uncover the truth, even if the accuser takes money/loses confidence to take it to court.You’re right in that it might not be true and there’s some dodgy people associated with the accuser, but it fits into Trump’s pattern of behaviour. Doubt it will ever come to court but there’s plenty more that is much more likely to.
The point was more that it’s another tie between Epstein and Trump (the date of the court writ is June 2016) which these QAnon nuts just ignore. (On top of the mountains of evidence that they were close).My Lord, that is a tough read.
Without it going to court and seeing the evidence though, it’s tough to see whether or not it was definitely true, I’ve just done some reading online on it.
Nothing surprises me any more with the elites associated with Epstein, so it wouldn’t make me fall off my chair if it was true, sadly.
It is a tough read, and I hope it isn't true.My Lord, that is a tough read.
Without it going to court and seeing the evidence though, it’s tough to see whether or not it was definitely true, I’ve just done some reading online on it.
Nothing surprises me any more with the elites associated with Epstein, so it wouldn’t make me fall off my chair if it was true, sadly.
It’s very much beyond the realms of doubt that Trump was associated with Epstein and there’s no way he wouldn’t have known all about Epstein.The point was more that it’s another tie between Epstein and Trump (the date of the court writ is June 2016) which these QAnon nuts just ignore. (On top of the mountains of evidence that they were close).
Remember this came out before Epstein became known for what we now know him as.
These are from the original case in 2016
View attachment 7425
View attachment 7426
Filed 20th June 2016 but I understand your point.It is a tough read, and I hope it isn't true.
The timing of the filing would at least give cause for some suspicion as to whether it had some ulterior motive - October 3 2016 in advance of the election on Nov 8th. The allegations relate to events in 1994. Create some dirt.
Scant consolation for such a horrific ordeal. Obviously I say that on the assumption of guilt.Filed 20th June 2016 but I understand your point.
Flip side is that if you knew the guy that raped you was running for POTUS and was an apparent billionaire, it would be the perfect time to file. She doesn’t ever need to work again now anyway.
Plus the small matter of being sued in court for raping a 13 year old *with* Epstein that was settled out of court.