Donald Trump

.
It is not easy to find senior full time judges because the pay is a fraction of what they earn as senior counsel.
Depends. Commercial counsel take a huge pay cut to enter the judiciary, criminal barristers, even silks, not so much. Plus the pension is incredible. Sit for twenty years as a judge and you get a two thirds pension when you retire, so it makes absolute sense for a criminal barrister in their early 50s to become a circuit judge, although many regret it once they have. It’s a very lonely job at times.
 
i appreciate the explanation though I am a little confused how politics are 100 percent eliminated from this system and how is it is 100 percent guaranteed to never be influenced let alone co-opted by bad actors.
I don’t suppose any process can be guaranteed to be free of party influence. Good will and British fair play may need to be at work. In this system, numbers should ensure bad actors are unlikely to be candidates. I shall refresh my memory as to the members of the appointments commission. Tbf, I don’t think there have been any serious complaints since the reforms of 20 years ago.
 
No, there is a body which I think is called the judicial appointments commission.I cant remember who sits on it, but other members of the bar and some politicians are there. It was set up in response to complaints that the judges and senior counsel that did the work previously only ever appointed white men. So now we have, mirabile dictu, female and ethnic minority judges too! It used to work on the “Buggins turn” principle but it is a bit more disciplined these days. Their deliberations, recommendations are still kept under wraps and appointments are made by the Lord Chancellor, who is a member of the cabinet appointed by the PM, and the Justice Secretary.
It is not easy to find senior full time judges because the pay is a fraction of what they earn as senior counsel.
Where The sovereign has a role, it is merely formal and he must act in accordance with the advice of ministers. This is the case for all instances of the Royal prerogative. The sovereign reigns, but does not rule.
PS Ha, I have just thought, the sovereign, of course, does not have sovereignty, that is reserved for Parliament. We fought a Civil war, invited in a Dutch king, and passed a Bill of Rights to ensure that was the case.

Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary are the same post nowadays, aren't they?
 
Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary are the same post nowadays, aren't they?
Oh, I’m not sure, you could well be correct.
PS Looked it up. You are right. It rather downplays the seniority of the Chancellor. The reforms were in 2005(?) so I haven’t quite caught up yet. Typical FOC.
 
Last edited:

Like a B rated movie bad guy he's literally telling the world his plans. Part of me thinks if he voted back in the US deserves it for letting someone like this take the piss.
The transcript is like the delusions of a rambling old codger sat in the nursing home.
I'm just surprised he didn't say he's Napoleon.
How could they even take this dangerous idiot seriously?

 
No I dont agree at all. Its a systemic problem that empowers these people
Right, which is like I said before — why every President before Trump and every Congress before MAGA acted exactly like them, why America has been an abject failure for nearly 250 years — because it’s the system, not rogue actors within it.
 
Right, which is like I said before — why every President before Trump and every Congress before MAGA acted exactly like them, why America has been an abject failure for nearly 250 years — because it’s the system, not rogue actors within it.
Every elected member of the federal government prior to Trump acted the way they did despite the system. They were all relatively stable, and honest (more or less - Nixon and Agnew being notable miscreants) Had anyone of the previously elected presidents been similar to Trump, with the same subservient members of Congress and the Senate there would have been very little to prevent a similar situation to what we have now.

Society has changed; the system of government hasn't kept up.
 
Every elected member of the federal government prior to Trump acted the way they did despite the system. They were all relatively stable, and honest (more or less - Nixon and Agnew being notable miscreants) Had anyone of the previously elected presidents been similar to Trump, with the same subservient members of Congress and the Senate there would have been very little to prevent a similar situation to what we have now.

Society has changed; the system of government hasn't kept up.
Rogue actors are rogue actors. Our remedy is to vote them all out. And any scenario you could come up with that somehow alters the “system” will have loopholes that rogue actors can exploit.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.