Dunn money

[blueonblue]

And no doubt those three would confirm without the likes of oakes neither would they, thats why a team is all about balance, any great team can be picked apart with so called better players added, but that changes the blend to something that wont work.

As to the club moving forward, that has yet to be seen, its still my veiw that a bad manager even with almost unlimited funds is still a bad manager, and hughes has not got it in him to build a team imho, that your happy at the moment with nine points is understandable, but are you as happy that Dunnie was given the run around by the petty bast*rd?.

 

[harry the plumber]

Dunnie was probably given his options by Hughes and it was then up to him.I say probably because like you non of us know what was said to Dunnie.
You also state the obvious about a team needing players like Oaks but he could have been replaced just like Dunnie but who would we have signed to take Bells place?
It is quite obvious you have a deep hatred of Hughes. So let`s hope at the end of the season Your telling us how anyone could have won what he as with his resources.

 

[Big G]

As a player you would want to be on the pitch rather than bench warming,
Dunnie's done us well over the years, and has also got himself a move to a decent club.