Could be anything really. But atleast we have a strategy now rather than just waiting for levy to lower the price.Interesting, have we gone plan B or are we trying to shit Levy up?
I watched a lot of their games last season and to say he’s raw would be putting it mildly. Takes a mean penalty and works his socks off, but he’s prone to missing the kinds of chances we cannot afford to miss.6'3 but no better in the air than 5'9 Gabby. Incredibly one footed. Awful first touch and is dispossessed all the time. Also a 67% pass completion would have Pep getting a hair transplant so he can pull it all out.
If a Spanish club is willing to pay so much for him it's probably a good indication to stay away.
This is moving quick. Apparently we are paying 80M. Atleti bid was 75M
Manchester City would have entered the bid for Dusan Vlahovic and proposed an offer that would reach 80M € between fixed part and variables. Barone is preparing the next steps for the Serbian, whose future at Fiorentina can be decided in hours
Lol No. He already rejected spurs. This could either be a back up option or to put pressure on levy.We buying him to have him part of the deal for Kane?
Who is buying gabby ?Honesrly 70m Euros on a stop gap potential player ain't that bad especially since we're most likely selling Jesus. Then next year we could go all in for Haaland and we'd have 2 very good strikers
I actually think we need to shift to this sort of deal, unearthing a young gem - remember when there were many who said £20m was way too much for Haaland yet Dortmund paid it. Same with Bellingham -12 months later lots of clubs regretted it. Sure 70m is still a lot of money and who knows if it would pan out or if we are really onto this deal but at 21 with seemingly all the basics he maybe worth a punt. Dealing with Napoli (last year) & Spurs this is never easy - they are shits and always try and rip our pants down and give us a good smacking.wouldn't buy a striker with 6 months of being worth 70m. too early.
I actually think we need to shift to this sort of deal, unearthing a young gem - remember when there were many who said £20m was way too much for Haaland yet Dortmund paid it. Same with Bellingham -12 months later lots of clubs regretted it. Sure 70m is still a lot of money and who knows if it would pan out or if we are really onto this deal but at 21 with seemingly all the basics he maybe worth a punt. Dealing with Napoli (last year) & Spurs this is never easy - they are shits and always try and rip our pants down and give us a good smacking.
As I said before 120m is the absolute max we should pay for Kane who after 3/4 years would be worth a fraction of the fee. Anything more would be foolish but it's not my £...Maybe it will boil down to Kane forcing the issue but Levy seems to not be a man of his word. Gentleman's agreement -yeah right.
You have to draw a line somewhere - would hate to give Spurs 150m+ which is what Levy wants.121m would be foolish but 120m wouldn't?
Who is buying gabby ?
70 m for half hit wonder?