You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Eamonn Holmes
- Thread starter scotty123
- Start date
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 34,603
Armaan said:Rooneys was a fluke... I'm sure he didn't intend to hit the ball with his shin. That fact will always be forgotten though.Markt85 said:Zlatan's was better - both great goals tho
clearly hits the shin, but the intent, technique and power was all there, a stunning goal. Dont care who scored it, who it was against, it was a great goal.
EricBrooksGhost
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 2,705
Markt85 said:Armaan said:Rooneys was a fluke... I'm sure he didn't intend to hit the ball with his shin. That fact will always be forgotten though.Markt85 said:Zlatan's was better - both great goals tho
shin != technique
I'm not buying that. It could have gone anywhere, absolute anywhere of his shin. He was just very lucky it sailed in to the top corner. Just like when your playing footy yourself, a cross comes in you stick out your foot but it comes off your leg and goes in. That happens all the time and that's still classed as a fluke because that's clearly not what you intended to do. Same when you've gone for a cross and it floats in to the net. Rooney didn't intentionally shin the ball, he ended up being very very lucky.Markt85 said:Armaan said:Rooneys was a fluke... I'm sure he didn't intend to hit the ball with his shin. That fact will always be forgotten though.Markt85 said:Zlatan's was better - both great goals tho
clearly hits the shin, but the intent, technique and power was all there, a stunning goal. Dont care who scored it, who it was against, it was a great goal.
Markt85 said:Armaan said:Rooneys was a fluke... I'm sure he didn't intend to hit the ball with his shin. That fact will always be forgotten though.Markt85 said:Zlatan's was better - both great goals tho
clearly hits the shin, but the intent, technique and power was all there, a stunning goal. Dont care who scored it, who it was against, it was a great goal.
Power LOL, he was all of 3-4 yards out. How do you know that if it made contact with his foot (as intended) it wouldn't have sailed over the bar...............luck!
Exactly.cookster said:Markt85 said:Armaan said:Rooneys was a fluke... I'm sure he didn't intend to hit the ball with his shin. That fact will always be forgotten though.
clearly hits the shin, but the intent, technique and power was all there, a stunning goal. Dont care who scored it, who it was against, it was a great goal.
Power LOL, he was all of 3-4 yards out. How do you know that if it made contact with his foot (as intended) it wouldn't have sailed over the bar...............luck!
mcfcnorthstand
Well-Known Member
Jabba the hut is a lucky man, his other half is a good looking lady.
Cheadle Blue
Well-Known Member
blue underpants said:Thank you youv just restored my equalibrium, and made me blub yet againBoyBlue_1985 said:Chill out
They will never do this
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qwoAIqynBc[/youtube]
I saw your comment and thought right, i bet i can watch it without any tears....i was wrong
laserblue
Well-Known Member
Markt85 said:Armaan said:Rooneys was a fluke... I'm sure he didn't intend to hit the ball with his shin. That fact will always be forgotten though.Markt85 said:Zlatan's was better - both great goals tho
clearly hits the shin, but the intent, technique and power was all there, a stunning goal. Dont care who scored it, who it was against, it was a great goal.
If the ball hadn't deflected off Richards at the last second he'd have shinned fresh air and looked a complete twat. He couldn't possibly have timed it anywhere near right on the ball's original trajectory. Therefore a complete fluke.