Eden Hazard

[blueinsa]

He fucking wishes.

Yep, that ship sailed for him I'm afraid.

 

[FantasyIreland]

To avoid any confusion,am I correct in saying....there are no new City links to this player?

 

[NQCitizen]

No he is not.

Just don't see it personally. What is isco truly outstanding at?

 

[blueinsa]

To avoid any confusion,am I correct in saying....there are no new City links to this player?

I see what you just did there ;-)

No, there isnt.

 

[Dax777]

Just don't see it personally. What is isco truly outstanding at?

Better ball control, better dribbler (Yes, he is better than Hazzard at what Hazzard is known for). Better passer, better vision, better defender, higher work rate. Hazard is quicker in and out of breaks, and scores more. But then again he has more opportunities.Average vision ( hence why he dribbles so much) decent passer, but not as good. Strikes the ball better, but makes more poor decisions shooting ( I.e. selfishly shooting off balance after 1 of his dribbling runs), that's why he misses a lot.

But the greatest difference is ball control. Isco is the closest thing to Iniesta I've seen when it comes to making a ball stick. He can control it at any height with ease. Hazzard in the other hand is at best decent.

There are other qualities Hazzard is better at, but they aren't quite easily quantifiable. I think he has a greater sense of confidence perhaps. And a belief he is the best player on the field regardless of what the facts actually are. I don't think Isco has that. But that is easy to develop.

In terms of Actual technical skill, Isco is better at almost all except for shooting, quickness ( not speed- as both are equally not top end speed wise) and Hazard's patented turn away dribble.

I'll take Isco everyday and Twice on Saturday.

 

[CatMan]

Better ball control, better dribbler (Yes, he is better than Hazzard at what Hazzard is known for). Better passer, better vision, better defender, higher work rate. Hazard is quicker in and out of breaks, and scores more. But then again he has more opportunities.Average vision ( hence why he dribbles so much) decent passer, but not as good. Strikes the ball better, but makes more poor decisions shooting ( I.e. selfishly shooting off balance after 1 of his dribbling runs), that's why he misses a lot.

But the greatest difference is ball control. Isco is the closest thing to Iniesta I've seen when it comes to making a ball stick. He can control it at any height with ease. Hazzard in the other hand is at best decent.

There are other qualities Hazzard is better at, but they aren't quite easily quantifiable. I think he has a greater sense of confidence perhaps. And a belief he is the best player on the field regardless of what the facts actually are. I don't think Isco has that. But that is easy to develop.

In terms of Actual technical skill, Isco is better at almost all except for shooting, quickness ( not speed- as both are equally not top end speed wise) and Hazard's patented turn away dribble.

I'll take Isco everyday and Twice on Saturday.

I love your posts. Always full of subjective crap ;-)

 

[richards30]

I love your posts. Always full of subjective crap ;-)

haha I know what you mean mate. Dax doesn't half over analyse everything! ;-)

 

[Dax777]

I love your posts. Always full of subjective crap ;-)

Moslt opinions about football players are subjective.

Mine and yours. :-)

 

[KCblue]

Woke up to a notification saying Hazard was off to Real for 32m pounds..surely they wouldn't sell that low?

 

[Dax777]

Woke up to a notification saying Hazard was off to Real for 32m pounds..surely they wouldn't sell that low?

What do you mean by a notification?