Eden Hazard

Daz_Blue said:
More chance of signing Mickey Hazzard
Click to expand...
It's Mullock though. He doesn't write bullshit as far as City goes. Hell I would even say that his transfer articles are basically direct talk from the top hierarchy at the club. It doesn't matter if we sign him or not, if Mullock is reporting it, then it means that the club thinks it's possible and they'll try.
 
More chance of signing Sanchez.......
 
Not that I think it'll happen, but saying Chelsea won't sell to us seems without merit. Especially after they sold Matic to United so recently.
Chelsea aren't exactly in penny pinching mode, but they'll take an offer if it's large enough whoever it's from I think.
Andrew___K said:
Hazard is a slightly better dribbler than Messi (at least his current version), but lesser playmaker/goalscorer. It's definitely not a ridiculous thing to say.
Click to expand...
I've felt similarly too about Hazard as a dribbler. Doesn't Hazard have by far and away the highest dribbling success rate in Europe too? I swear I read that somewhere.
 
01cravend said:
Best dribbler in the world which leads him to be over-rated as an overall player.

10 assists in last 3 league seasons combined, Sane has that many this season alone already.
A goal every 3 games for Chelsea, which is okay, but he is their pen taker.
1 tackle and 3 interceptions are his defensive contributions in 20 league games so far this season(Sane 13 tackles, 8 interceptions, 5 clearances, 1 block)
Click to expand...
Yes, but apart from all that????
 
Oh eck I see the next 4 -5K page thread. One out of ten chance. That is only based on all the top players going to Madrid!!!!!!

Neymar -200m
Hazard =150m
Kane -200m
De Gea - 100m

Have RM got a budget of 650m? I dont think so.So there may be a chance one of the above i e., Hazard could be sold to another club.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We declined and withdrew from the player's contract transfer negotiations in 2012 when the price was 35 million due to our refusal to pay commission to the player's agent, and we are willing now to pay 150 million?
 
Millennium said:
We declined and withdrew from the player's contract transfer negotiations in 2012 when the price was 35 million due to our refusal to pay commission to the player's agent, and we are willing now to pay 150 million?
Click to expand...

Things change though,and may well have done in last 6 years,I'd take him in a heartbeat,arguably one of the best,if not the best in the league at what he does,get him in I say...............................as long as the rumour is true of course
 
More likely to go to the rags with the sheer ludicrous amounts being bandied about.
Wouldn't get my hopes up.
 
Would be great to have him. Don't see this ever happening.

Remember Hazard did dick us around for a long time before joining Chelsea.
 
Rammyblues said:
Oh eck I see the next 4 -5K page thread. One out of ten chance. That is only based on all the top players going to Madrid!!!!!!

Neymar -200m
Hazard =150m
Kane -200m
De Gay - 100m

Have RM got a budget of 650m? I dont think so.So there may be a chance one of the above i e., Hazard could be sold to another club.
Click to expand...

Small change for the Banca de Espana! And let's not forget - MCFC are the only team for whom FFP seems to be an issue. MANUre generate every last penny they spend from Uncle Malc's shopping malls and the generous tax system in the Caymans, the top (two?) Spanish clubs seem to be outside the regs, and PSG just two finger the whole stinking edifice which is Uefa!
 
Akira said:
Would be great to have him. Don't see this ever happening.

Remember Hazard did dick us around for a long time before joining Chelsea.
Click to expand...
At the time, Chelsea were in 5th place in the league, but went on to win the CL final.

IIRC, Hazard & his agent preferred Chelsea's bid because it met their financial demands, however they were prepared to accept City's bid if Chelsea failed to get into the following season's CL. Chelsea won the final & the rest was history.

BUT, this was that strange window whereby we'd won the league in dramatic circumstances, & Mancini wanted Hazard, RVP, Martinez, Di Rossi & another player whose name escapes me, but we ended up with Rodwell, Sinclair, Garcia, Nastasic & Maicon.
 
Never going to happen unless the player puts up an absolute fuss about moving to us.

I reckon Chelsea would rather lose him for £30m to Real Madrid than sell him to us for £150m.

Would we ever dream of selling De Bruyne to Chelsea? That’s about the closest equivalent.

Best player for best player.
 
cadds92 said:
Never going to happen unless the player puts up an absolute fuss about moving to us.

I reckon Chelsea would rather lose him for £30m to Real Madrid than sell him to us for £150m.

Would we ever dream of selling De Bruyne to Chelsea? That’s about the closest equivalent.

Best player for best player.
Click to expand...
If KDB wanted to leave & the money on offer met our valuation, then why not?

If anything, the Sanchez transfer to ManUre has reinforced the notion that money talks.

In terms of Hazard to City, I'm thinking this link has more to do with the player quoting in an interview how he admired our football, than having any real substance to it.

It's just a personal view & tbh I'd be cool with or without him. I've suffered enough disappointment with Alves & Sanchez to last me for a few seasons yet... :-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top