Eden Hazard

Funny after PSG spunked ridicules money on Neymar the new norm for a top player is 200m it’s fcuking stupid money and why the new ffp wants clubs to be able to only spend 100m net a season.
 
Damocles said:
This feels like a ploy from the Hazard camp to generate interest.
Click to expand...

From Simon Mullock? If it were Matt Law or another Chelsea based journalist I'd completely agree but Mullock involvement points to someone around City coming up with this.

I think it makes sense that we'd try for him anyway.
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
Hazard would be a pointless signing for us. He'd be getting booked every week for diving. Unlike when he plays for Chelsea and gets away with it week-in, week-out.
Click to expand...

Ah yes. Because Chelsea never ever get in trouble for diving, and definitely didn't have 2 players sent off for it in 1 game last week.
 
TonyM said:
''Twas the same with the previous manager. But still true that Pep is better sand knows what he's getting into.

Can't see it either. Especially after Sanchez - these players will always go to the clubs who'll pay them the most and that no longer seems to be us (good/bad thing I guess).
Click to expand...


The Belgian FA only picks shite managers - Wilmots was terrible and Belgium have got where they are due to the ridiculous talent in the squad.

I can't see it happening but I could definitely see Pep making it work
 
domalino said:
From Simon Mullock? If it were Matt Law or another Chelsea based journalist I'd completely agree but Mullock involvement points to someone around City coming up with this.

I think it makes sense that we'd try for him anyway.
Click to expand...
The same Simon Mullock that's looked at KDB's new contract of £200k+£60k p/w and reported it in that article as £300k+£50k p/w?
 
I think City let random rumours and misinformation flourish whilst keeping actual targets as secret as possible.
 
domalino said:
From Simon Mullock? If it were Matt Law or another Chelsea based journalist I'd completely agree but Mullock involvement points to someone around City coming up with this.

I think it makes sense that we'd try for him anyway.
Click to expand...

From a financial point of view can we afford a player like him ?
Not saying we don´t need or want him just that others have currently got more financial power than us particularly regarding our internal pay structure and the Sanchez decision made by our club.
 
Pep has just given us all the heads up that we aren't in a position to spend record sums on a player, after last week explaining that we aren't going to upset the apple cart by paying higher wages to a player coming in.

So on here: we might be signing Hazard for 150 mil.

The same player who we could have signed several years ago, but pulled out due to outrageous financial demands.

But this time, presumably his agent won't want a huge payoff & Hazard a genuine 'A' list player, will be happy to play for us, for less money than 29 year old, B list Sanchez is getting at Utd, rather than earn more, at Real Madrid.

Sounds feasible.
 
Neville Kneville said:
Pep has just given us all the heads up that we aren't in a position to spend record sums on a player, after last week explaining that we aren't going to upset the apple cart by paying higher wages to a player coming in.

So on here: we might be signing Hazard for 150 mil.

The same player who we could have signed several years ago, but pulled out due to outrageous financial demands.

But this time, presumably his agent won't want a huge payoff & Hazard a genuine 'A' list player, will be happy to play for us, for less money than 29 year old, B list Sanchez is getting at Utd, rather than earn more, at Real Madrid.

Sounds feasible.
Click to expand...
Sanchez is not B List. He was motm in his first game v Yeovil.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top