grunge
Well-Known Member
Fair enough, I wasn't aware that Musk would need a security clearance to do whatever he thinks he is doing for Trump. I didn't think sanctions covered communication either, but I may be wrong.
The point about the Times report on government/FO discussions about the 115 is that it is almost certainly nothing dressed up with selected, or at the most charitable incomplete, out-of-context quotes. It could very well be the same with this WSJ article. That was all. Just trying to be consistent here: not putting down the Times article while getting excited about the WSJ article.
He might not need security clearance for his work with Trump but seeing as space x launches us military satellites and star link is also used by the US military he will more than likely be a security risk there. He’s already proven he is willing and able to manipulate starlink on a whim.
Will be interesting to see if space x is quietly dropped from launching sensitive military satellites now.