Has nothing to do with the Premier League. And no one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland. We simply didn't sell out the allocation given to us. It does happen you know.CITY FOR LIFE said:Just been on ESPN, Due to Ytd fans not sitting down the Prem Lge held beack those seats same as they did with ours at Sunderland. This should help clubs that are struggling for attendances. ???????????????
Manci7y said:3000 less tickets cos the rags insist on standing up..
de niro said:Manci7y said:3000 less tickets cos the rags insist on standing up..
i think this is unfair,how else can they stretch their legs after a long train journey from landan.
Our allocation was reduced due to standing up last season..paul calfs tash said:Has nothing to do with the Premier League. And no one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland. We simply didn't sell out the allocation given to us. It does happen you know.CITY FOR LIFE said:Just been on ESPN, Due to Ytd fans not sitting down the Prem Lge held beack those seats same as they did with ours at Sunderland. This should help clubs that are struggling for attendances. ???????????????
paul calfs tash said:Has nothing to do with the Premier League. And no one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland. We simply didn't sell out the allocation given to us. It does happen you know.CITY FOR LIFE said:Just been on ESPN, Due to Ytd fans not sitting down the Prem Lge held beack those seats same as they did with ours at Sunderland. This should help clubs that are struggling for attendances. ???????????????
We sent around 700 of that allocation back. I'm afraid we only had about 2,000 there. So like I said we didn't sell our allocation.bluesmith said:paul calfs tash said:Has nothing to do with the Premier League. And no one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland. We simply didn't sell out the allocation given to us. It does happen you know.
I assume the official website is lying to us all then?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2010/March/Fewer-seats-at-Sunderland" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/20 ... Sunderland</a>
paul calfs tash said:We sent around 700 of that allocation back. I'm afraid we only habluesmith said:I assume the official website is lying to us all then?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2010/March/Fewer-seats-at-Sunderland" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/20 ... Sunderland</a>
d about 2,000 there. So like I said we didn't sell our allocation.
It was only reduced by a couple of hundred ffs. And the fact we couldn't sell out that allocation makes the comparison pretty pointless.Manci7y said:paul calfs tash said:We sent around 700 of that allocation back. I'm afraid we only ha
d about 2,000 there. So like I said we didn't sell our allocation.
that wasn't the point being made... Like was said we had a reduced allocation
paul calfs tash said:We sent around 700 of that allocation back. I'm afraid we only had about 2,000 there. So like I said we didn't sell our allocation.bluesmith said:I assume the official website is lying to us all then?
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/2010/March/Fewer-seats-at-Sunderland" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Club-news/20 ... Sunderland</a>
no one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland
They gave us 2,700 from a normal allocation of what? 3,000 maybe? That's the normal Premier League allocation. So big deal they held back a poxy 300 seat's which we wouldn't have sold anyway.bluesmith said:paul calfs tash said:We sent around 700 of that allocation back. I'm afraid we only had about 2,000 there. So like I said we didn't sell our allocation.
You saidno one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland
Which is quite clearly bollocks.
paul calfs tash said:They gave us 2,700 from a normal allocation of what? 3,000 maybe? That's the normal Premier League allocation. So big deal they held back a poxy 300 seat's which we wouldn't have sold anyway.bluesmith said:You said
Which is quite clearly bollocks.
And there is the answer to everything on here. He must be a rag.mad zab said:paul calfs tash said:They gave us 2,700 from a normal allocation of what? 3,000 maybe? That's the normal Premier League allocation. So big deal they held back a poxy 300 seat's which we wouldn't have sold anyway.
Does anyone else think this prick is a rag?
LOL whether we sold out or not is not the issue you saidpaul calfs tash said:They gave us 2,700 from a normal allocation of what? 3,000 maybe? That's the normal Premier League allocation. So big deal they held back a poxy 300 seat's which we wouldn't have sold anyway.bluesmith said:You said
Which is quite clearly bollocks.
no one held back any seat's for our visit to Sunderland
mad zab said:paul calfs tash said:They gave us 2,700 from a normal allocation of what? 3,000 maybe? That's the normal Premier League allocation. So big deal they held back a poxy 300 seat's which we wouldn't have sold anyway.
Does anyone else think this prick is a rag?