That's exactly what you said.
Taken out of context though, the arguement is about how good or bad we are, if you want to let fluking our way to a semi-final, losing to 3 teams in the tournament and only scoring one goal from open play (plus a huge deflection) cloud your judgement then fine, go for it. I'll let my own eyes tell me we're not very good and need to massively improve or we'll continue down the path of mediocrity.
Luckier?
You mean by being better at putting the ball in the net than the opposition?
That's not luck.
Not luck? Of course it is, when your shower of shit won at our place a while back, after we'd hit the woodwork something like 6 times and you got a last minute penalty to win, was that not luck? Would you seriously argue you were better than us?
It's opinions and views like yours and Marks which will continue to hold England back. We're supposed to be one of the elite nations, so much money is flowing through the English game that it's bordering on criminal that we're classing ourselves as the plucky underdog. But until the coaching system and picking of players who can fit that system is sorted out we'll continue to achieve the total sum of fuck all, but at least you'll be happy right?
I thought when Southgate started to play out from the back that we finally had someone with some semblance of a plan, to then try and shoe the likes of Henderson, Lingard, Maguire, Rashford, Wellbeck, Jones, Dier into it shows he's either not watching these players be unable to pass the ball each week comfortably for their teams in the Prem or just picking them because they play for the so called top clubs.
If he wanted players who could actually pass he could have looked at Wilshire, Maddison, Foden, Barkley, Shelvey. But no he went for tried and tested and once again we're out of our depth.