Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Is giving the papers to a policeman guarding the estate successfully serving them?
Legally I wouldn't have thought so. But how do you serve papers to a prince, in hiding, with his own armed guards?
I guess any sane judge would consider them served, given the circumstance.
 
maybe,,a policeman is a sworn in servant to the crown,its a massive cock up by lawyers if its not and for what these people charge i'm sure the homework has been done
I can just imagine some chubby cop, stuffing his face with a sausage barm, brown sauce stains down his uniform, guarding an entrance, going " yeah I'll pass it on" whilst his colleagues are shouting " NOOOOOOOOOO". ;-)
 
I'll preface this post by saying I've never been a royalist. In fact I'm as polar opposite as can be. So my opinion isn't going to be nuanced and "fair".

The Royal Family is, in my view, an outdated, callous institution. All monarchies are. They are a perversion of equality and the so-called democratic values claimed to be upheld by the nations that still champion these institutions. If my idealogy on this needed rubber-stamping (it didn't), then the Prince Andrew affair has succeeded.

I was away with work when the infamous BBC interview took place, so I had no idea of its existence until I returned to the UK and a few of my mates told me about this bona-fide TV car crash. They mentioned the sweat angle and I thought they were just embellishing or fibbing. So imagine my downright disbelief when I watched it. It's plainly obvious he's hiding something. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, which is why I want him dragged before a judge; but anyone who believes this man is innocent is naive in the extreme.

As someone else alluded to in the thread, how can you possibly be served court papers correctly if you're ensconced in a palace that's protected on high?

Also, I'm a total novice when it comes to the intricacies of international law but could someone tell me the likelihood of this ever going to trial and what would need to happen? What's the percentage chance?
 
I'll preface this post by saying I've never been a royalist. In fact I'm as polar opposite as can be. So my opinion isn't going to be nuanced and "fair".

The Royal Family is, in my view, an outdated, callous institution. All monarchies are. They are a perversion of equality and the so-called democratic values claimed to be upheld by the nations that still champion these institutions. If my idealogy on this needed rubber-stamping (it didn't), then the Prince Andrew affair has succeeded.

I was away with work when the infamous BBC interview took place, so I had no idea of its existence until I returned to the UK and a few of my mates told me about this bona-fide TV car crash. They mentioned the sweat angle and I thought they were just embellishing or fibbing. So imagine my downright disbelief when I watched it. It's plainly obvious he's hiding something. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, which is why I want him dragged before a judge; but anyone who believes this man is innocent is naive in the extreme.

As someone else alluded to in the thread, how can you possibly be served court papers correctly if you're ensconced in a palace that's protected on high?

Also, I'm a total novice when it comes to the intricacies of international law but could someone tell me the likelihood of this ever going to trial and what would need to happen? What's the percentage chance?
It’s a civil case, not a criminal case. He will be found guilty in absentia if he fails to respond and she will be awarded damages.
 
The girl was trafficked and abused as was a lot of them, andrew would have known that being such a close friend of the dead nonce
Andrew said that he thought all the young women floating around Epsteins house on his island were servants. Hmmm...
 
there are one or two videos out there on youtube that break down the interview, the sweating story was outstanding and dismissed by medidcal pro's, body language is one of the biggest signs when lies are being told, he fails at every point, a very bad move from him doing that interview
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top