Anyone here under the age of 18 is a child, doesn't mean they are not above the age of consent.
Blue Llama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 5,631
If that was the case as I said earlier why was he not accused of rape. Or are you suggesting that the States DA office and the complainants all took pity on him and didn't accuse him of the more serious crime?
denislawsbackheel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Messages
- 27,445
- Team supported
- We went to Rotherham…
The DA was not involved in the civil action
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,490
Does the age of consent mean that anyone under that age isn’t legally allowed to give consent and therefore it would be classed as rape?
Regardless of age, if the complainant has been coerced into having sex (which she said she was) then it can fall into the realm of rape.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I'm suggesting nothing, simply relaying what was said on TV that she was underage
Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,426
It was a civil case. The plaintiff decides what the accusation is
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
They are..... if the two consenting parties are aged 16 and 17 nothing would happen. But when one is 17 and the other in his 40's or older it is slightly different.
I think the age difference has to be no more than 3 years difference and that one party has not exerted power over the other (taking mental ability into it).
I worked in a children's home and the kids (all 60 of them spread over 5 houses on one site) would be up to all sorts. If something sexual happened between kids and they were more than 3 (it may even have been two, certainly if they were younger) years between them then we had to call the social services.... if within that period it didn't become an issue if consensual.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,490
In an unexpected twist, Prince Andrew is now paying Virginia Giuffre to keep her mouth closed.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Seems to be a lot of confusion about civil versus criminal cases , also she was a trafficked , groomed girl and was 17 which is below the age of consent in some states
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
The grand old Duke of York,
he had 12 million quid,
he gave it to someone he had never met,
for something he never did.
he had 12 million quid,
he gave it to someone he had never met,
for something he never did.
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
But would the married ones?
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
No NDA signed. Further more, To clear up some of the sentiment that has led to some posters accusing her of protecting abusers from criminal prosecution- NDAs cannot legally prevent criminal disclosure and any clauses that purport to do so are null and void.
Even Epstein's agreement with Giuffre declared that in a standard boiler plate clause.
Andrew's alleged offences in the US are outside the statute of limitations period.
The Met closed the investigation into alleged offences in the UK.
meaww.com
Even Epstein's agreement with Giuffre declared that in a standard boiler plate clause.
Andrew's alleged offences in the US are outside the statute of limitations period.
The Met closed the investigation into alleged offences in the UK.
Royals fear tell-all book by Virginia Giuffre can make Prince Andrew scandal 'go on and on'
Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre have signed a settlement but she did not sign an NDA, which is quite risky for the Duke
meaww.com
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,490
Whatever comes out can’t really do much now though?No NDA signed. Further more, To clear up some of the sentiment that has led to some posters accusing her of protecting abusers from criminal prosecution- NDAs cannot legally prevent criminal disclosure and any clauses that purport to do so are null and void.
Even Epstein's agreement with Giuffre declared that in a standard boiler plate clause.
Andrew's alleged offences in the US are outside the statute of limitations period.
The Met closed the investigation into alleged offences in the UK.
Royals fear tell-all book by Virginia Giuffre can make Prince Andrew scandal 'go on and on'
Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre have signed a settlement but she did not sign an NDA, which is quite risky for the Duke
Andrew’s name is mud. He’s been accused of lots of things, but had none proven.
The book can throw more accusations out, but they won’t be proven.
Peoples’ opinion of Andrew are already set in stone. They think he’s a paedophile.
Whatever any book suggests, his reputation can hardly be sullied any further.
As if people are actually okay with fucking a 17 year old. 17! 12 months out of high school. Illegal, maybe not, weird as fuck and a bit noncey, most definitely.
This girl has been trafficked to a different country then coerced into having sex with much older men. Whole thing is fucking disgusting
This girl has been trafficked to a different country then coerced into having sex with much older men. Whole thing is fucking disgusting
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 70,490
Would you feel the same if it had happened in this country? The having sex with a 17 year old, not the coercion bit, obviously.
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Who would pay £12m for something they claim they hadn't done and not have a gagging order included?
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
This. Cnut as he is, Andrew doesn’t monopolise dodginess.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
And £50 for the long ones? ;)
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Total lack of understanding of the whole situation