gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Firstly your deployment of the term “alleged ilk” marks you down as a spineless ****. If you’ve got something to say, then say it. You spineless ****.
Secondly, I haven’t defended him for shagging a seventeen year old and nor would I. The fact you’ve arrived at that conclusion based on what I’ve posted marks you as a bit simple. It was reprehensible and deserved censure and punishment. Unlike others, including you it would appear, however, I am capable of applying a degree of proportionality to this behaviour which falls far short of the absurdity of calling him a paedophile, which shagging a seveteen year old plainly does not make him. To suggest it does it preposterous.
Like I said, I don’t know a single mother who would cut their son off for such a thing, but perhaps you do. Maybe your mother feels differently.
There’s a difference between defending something and applying an objective and proportionate assement of what is a reasonable response to it in the circumstances. A mother cutting their son off should be reserved for far worse things than this.
So in summary, you are a bit simple and a spineless **** who is incapable of objective thought.