Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten Windsor / Maxwell

[lonestay]

Probably best for him to bugger off abroad somewhere.

Maybe not go buggering abroad not with his reputation.

 

[Nightmare Walking]

Ten a day would fucking kill you, mate.

I reckon I could manage 4.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I reckon I could manage 4.

Depends which day!

 

[Nightmare Walking]

I would have to do a month's notice. I could get in shape by then.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I would have to do a month's notice. I could get in shape by then.

No wanking for a month and you might just manage to make it to day 2.

 

[Scottyboi]

For me, having sex with someone who was so conspicuously trafficked (like what else was she doing in the company of Epstein and Maxwell?) is more egregious than technical arguments about a few months here and there and which age of consent applies where.

He will have unquestionably concluded why she was there, and how she got there, and under what broad type of arrangement she was having sex with him. He simply cannot have thought she was there for any other reason or that her consent to it all was unequivocal and informed.

100% and if we look at the birthday cards and other letters Epstein has received over the years, it's clear his friends knew the score and were fine with it or even participated.

 

[dronefromsector7G]

I reckon I could manage 4 if they had cocks

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Ten a day would fucking kill you, mate.

Then he’s not suited for the role at all.

The last grand old Duke of York had 10,000 men.

 

[Scottyboi]

40 a day without the ability to sweat, he would overheat within the first 20 minutes.

 

[Mad Eyed Screamer]

What’s this Egghead thing, mate?

I don’t like to talk about it. I’m a private person….

 

[pepguardiola'smoustache]

It is interesting he is going to sheltered at Sandringham.

The very place where the royal family, allegedly, invited savile for xmas at the behest of his pal, the now king.
Of course, there's no actual proof of this known to us, the general public, so like everything else to do with all this, we remain uninformed of the facts because it's not in our best interests.

 

[johnny crossan]

It may have been that you expected me to understand but I did not, which is hardly surprising as the second paragraph in your post above now concedes that parents do play a part in shaping the character of their children, which appears to contradict what your previous post said, namely that The Queen and Prince Phillip bear no responsibility for his misconduct, which clearly in this instance arises from his character.

So whatever implied premise you were attempting to convey is confused and unclear.

No it isn't, my view us that we alone have responsiblity for our actions whatever hand of cards we are given to play. Blaming the Queen for her son's conduct is just plain wrong.

 

[blueish swede]

Why don't you just stfu trying to find a silver bullet when there isn't one.

​

• The age of consent in the UK is 16.
• However, if someone under 18 is trafficked or exploited for sex, it is always illegal — even if they appear to consent.
• Under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, any sexual activity with a person under 18 involved in commercial sex or trafficking is considered child sexual exploitation or child trafficking, not prostitution.
• In other words:
  

---

​

• The age of consent varies by state (usually 16–18).
• But under federal law (18 U.S.C. §1591, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act):
  
  
• So, there is no age of consent for a trafficked minor — it’s always a crime for anyone to engage in or profit from such acts.

Sean "P Diddy Puff Daddy" Combs was convicted even though his victims were older. There is no age limit if the trafficking is across state lines, as stipulated in the Mann Act of 1910. Also called the White-Slave Traffic Act.

 

[Lowtower]

No it isn't, my view us that we alone have responsiblity for our actions whatever hand of cards we are given to play. Blaming the Queen for her son's conduct is just plain wrong.

But we should judge the Queen on her decision to pay 12 million pounds out for him though

And that was sick cuntish behaviour.

 

[Big Joe Corrigan]

Then he’s not suited for the role at all.

The last grand old Duke of York had 10,000 men.

Brilliant!

 

[red 2 hats]

Get the nonce jailed, do not pass go and don't collect £200, randy Andy should be getting bummed and shared around the block, just like his victims were.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

No it isn't, my view is that we alone have responsiblity for our actions whatever hand of cards we are given to play. Blaming the Queen for her son's conduct is just plain wrong.

I haven’t blamed her for his conduct, what I’ve said is that she will have helped shape the person that engaged in that conduct.

There is a distinction which you appear to be struggling to appreciate.

 

[johnnytapia]

I find it amusing that Andrew’s new name is Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, giver Mountbatten’s alleged desire for teenage boys……

How did they know Mountbatten had dandruff? They found his Head and Shoulders on the beach.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

The very place where the royal family, allegedly, invited savile for xmas at the behest of his pal, the now king.
Of course, there's no actual proof of this known to us, the general public, so like everything else to do with all this, we remain uninformed of the facts because it's not in our best interests.

Ridiculous username.

 

[Earlyriser]

I reckon I could manage 4.

For him.. no sweat