Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Hamann Pineapple said:
11kbkfq.jpg
Is that real or someone pissing about?
 
Hamann Pineapple said:
Damocles said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
So the system is flawed when he is found not guilty

No the system works fine, your logic is flawed.

Let's say a guy shoots another guy in the face. Guilty? Let's say that guy is a Policeman and the victim is a terrorist who was about to denote a bomb to that would kill thousands. Still guilty?

Let's say a guy stabs someone whilst trying to rob them. Guilty? Let's then say that the guy stabbed someone as part of a struggle and the other person was a kidnapper who held his kid and had her location on him as part of a bargaining deal. Still guilty?

The justice system has worked for thousands of years because it attempts to get ALL of the facts surrounding the case and put a single incident into context. Colinbellsjockstrap's example is one where he has removed any and all context from the example so there's nothing else to judge them on. That is why somebody is innocent until they get through the justice system - unlike normal people, the justice system will attempt to find all relevant details surrounding a case rather than just what's in front of them and they require proper methodologies and evidence to do it.

The system is flawed because the amount of money the defendant is able to pay for their defence invariably affects the outcome. Getting off on a technicality does not make someone innocent it purely means the defence lawyer was able to circumnavigate the letter of the law.

No doubt aboat it, you seariuously mast have the Navy on the brain...
 
Re: Prine Andrew named in under age sex lawsuit

-dabz- said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
urmston said:
Senior police, BBC staff, council officials, civil servants and NHS staff are all virtually immune to any accountability and any inquiries into their alleged wrongdoings are virtually guaranteed to be a whitewash.

The establishment always closes ranks to protect its own and royals are about as establishment as you can get.

Didn't they have the law amended last year to grant new privacy for Royals. Coincidence I'm sure.
Yep, I think Prince Charles had it pushed through somehow.

ROYALTY?
shoot Hen Harriers from the skies,fuck our kids,without any questions being asked.
and still royal.
what does royal actually mean?..is it like the local chinese takeaway."sandringham house special"
confused.com
 
tiggsywiggsywoo said:
If he stood trial, was found guilty, and served time. Would he get his job back as Prince?
Of course he should if he's done his time *
 
bobmcfc said:
tiggsywiggsywoo said:
If he stood trial, was found guilty, and served time. Would he get his job back as Prince?
Of course he should if he's done his time *
But he might have to be prince in another country before he was accepted back here. Malta perhaps.
 
East Level 2 said:
bobmcfc said:
tiggsywiggsywoo said:
If he stood trial, was found guilty, and served time. Would he get his job back as Prince?
Of course he should if he's done his time *
But he might have to be prince in another country before he was accepted back here. Malta perhaps.
I'm sure Malta would make him a great offer
 
I personally stick to the principal of guilty until proven innocent in celeb nonce cases. It has served me well in the recent past. I'm not being judgmental, if I was a minted Prince I'd be banging everything (over the age of consent) that I fancied.
 
Damocles said:
ColinBellsjockstrap said:
Difficult this presumed innocent until found guilty thing...........

Generally, I agree with it but:-

If someone stabs a guy in the street, whilst trying to rob them, in full view of 20 bystanders, is arrested, and goes before the beak, is he "innocent" before a verdict is announced?

He has obviously committed the crime...............

Yes, he is. Nobody is guilty until they have been adjudged as so by our justice system.

Or by the justice system of any other country in the world, not just ours i presume?
Whats so special about our justice system?
 
I still don't think Prince Andrew should be allowed to play professional football again, either here or in Malta.
 
Helmet Cole said:
I still don't think Prince Andrew should be allowed to play professional football again, either here or in Malta.

What if he says sorry

What if he doesn't say sorry.

What if she was just drinking too much and forgot she said yes ?
 
Squelch said:
In the UK the Royal Family's muzzling of the British media is so tight we never hear a fraction of what is reported abroad. Read this old article in the US Vanity Fair magazine (hardly a scandal sheet) to get a better idea of 'Randy Andy'.

http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/08/prince-andrew-201108


Most interesting. Faint whiff of blackmail?

Koo Stark defends Andrew:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2953899/Koo-Stark-reveals-truth-Prince-Andrew-32-years-silence-Prince-s-ex-lover-gives-account-affair-defend-sex-slave-claims.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... laims.html</a>
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top